PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSTZ vs. AGNC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BSTZ vs. AGNC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Science and Technology Term Trust (BSTZ) and AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSTZ achieves a 28.07% return, which is significantly higher than AGNC's 8.86% return.


BSTZ

1D
0.40%
1M
-10.47%
6M
26.89%
YTD
28.07%
1Y
44.49%
3Y*
27.66%
5Y*
3.19%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.42%

AGNC

1D
-2.67%
1M
6.36%
6M
-2.18%
YTD
8.86%
1Y
35.55%
3Y*
18.92%
5Y*
5.73%
10Y*
6.66%
ALL TIME*
11.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSTZ vs. AGNC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BSTZ
BlackRock Science and Technology Term Trust
28.07%25.06%37.49%18.72%-55.34%12.71%87.46%5.04%
AGNC
AGNC Investment Corp.
8.86%34.92%8.90%10.14%-21.65%5.20%-1.78%12.15%

Correlation

The correlation between BSTZ and AGNC is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2019

0.37

The correlation between BSTZ and AGNC shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.41 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BSTZ:

$1.90B

AGNC:

$12.54B

EPS

BSTZ:

$8.53

AGNC:

$2.00

PE Ratio

BSTZ:

3.24

AGNC:

5.45

PEG Ratio

BSTZ:

0.36

AGNC:

0.01

PS Ratio

BSTZ:

5.26

AGNC:

3.92

PB Ratio

BSTZ:

1.11

AGNC:

1.20

Total Revenue (TTM)

BSTZ:

$361.49M

AGNC:

$3.09B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BSTZ:

$169.67M

AGNC:

$2.34B

EBITDA (TTM)

BSTZ:

$586.67M

AGNC:

$3.91B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSTZ vs. AGNC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSTZ
BSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
BSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
BSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

AGNC
AGNC Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
AGNC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGNC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGNC Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
AGNC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGNC Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSTZ vs. AGNC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Science and Technology Term Trust (BSTZ) and AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BSTZAGNCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.30

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.58

1.91

+1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.56

5.34

+6.23

BSTZ vs. AGNC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSTZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the AGNC Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSTZ and AGNC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BSTZ vs. AGNC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSTZ drawdown since its inception was -60.51%, which is greater than AGNC's maximum drawdown of -54.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSTZ and AGNC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSTZAGNCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.51%

-54.56%

-5.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.49%

-18.71%

+6.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.31%

-31.04%

+5.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.51%

-50.28%

-10.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.14%

-4.46%

-7.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.18%

-13.51%

-13.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.86%

6.68%

-2.82%

Volatility

BSTZ vs. AGNC - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Science and Technology Term Trust (BSTZ) has a higher volatility of 11.41% compared to AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC) at 6.27%. This indicates that BSTZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGNC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSTZAGNCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.41%

6.27%

+5.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.50%

16.72%

+6.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.71%

20.27%

+6.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.09%

25.76%

+2.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.40%

25.46%

+4.94%

Dividends

BSTZ vs. AGNC - Dividend Comparison

BSTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.72%, less than AGNC's 13.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGNC
AGNC Investment Corp.
13.19%13.43%15.64%14.68%13.91%9.57%10.00%11.31%12.31%10.70%12.69%14.30%
BSTZ
BlackRock Science and Technology Term Trust
8.72%12.46%9.75%10.90%14.73%5.14%3.42%2.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

BSTZ vs. AGNC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BlackRock Science and Technology Term Trust and AGNC Investment Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-2.00B-1.00B0.001.00B2.00B3.00BOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
140.57M
0
(BSTZ) Total Revenue
(AGNC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


BSTZ and AGNC have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BSTZ has higher volatility (11.41%) compared to AGNC (6.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSTZ dropped -60.51% vs AGNC's -54.56%.

AGNC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSTZ and AGNC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer