PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BST vs. NIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BST vs. NIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Science and Technology Trust (BST) and Virtus Equity & Convertible Income Fund (NIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BST achieves a 21.48% return, which is significantly higher than NIE's 8.90% return. Over the past 10 years, BST has outperformed NIE with an annualized return of 20.10%, while NIE has yielded a comparatively lower 14.12% annualized return.


BST

1D
2.64%
1M
6.02%
YTD
21.48%
6M
27.08%
1Y
42.06%
3Y*
22.50%
5Y*
4.54%
10Y*
20.10%

NIE

1D
0.53%
1M
-0.78%
YTD
8.90%
6M
10.96%
1Y
24.35%
3Y*
19.17%
5Y*
10.22%
10Y*
14.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BST vs. NIE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BST
BlackRock Science and Technology Trust
21.48%23.65%17.96%30.07%-38.28%-0.35%69.27%34.57%8.84%57.43%
NIE
Virtus Equity & Convertible Income Fund
8.90%12.15%28.64%26.71%-26.73%18.89%33.78%31.09%-5.69%23.68%

Correlation

The correlation between BST and NIE is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2014

0.69

The correlation between BST and NIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BST vs. NIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BST
BST Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
BST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BST Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
BST Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
BST Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
BST Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

NIE
NIE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
NIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
NIE Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
NIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
NIE Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BST vs. NIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Science and Technology Trust (BST) and Virtus Equity & Convertible Income Fund (NIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BSTNIEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.37

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

2.72

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.87

11.23

-2.36

BST vs. NIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BST Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the NIE Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BST and NIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BST vs. NIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BST drawdown since its inception was -47.72%, smaller than the maximum NIE drawdown of -57.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BST and NIE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSTNIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.72%

-57.90%

+10.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.31%

-8.99%

-6.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.37%

-20.79%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.72%

-31.04%

-16.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.72%

-38.99%

-8.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.13%

-1.95%

-2.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.96%

-8.00%

-4.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.76%

2.18%

+2.58%

Volatility

BST vs. NIE - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Science and Technology Trust (BST) has a higher volatility of 9.75% compared to Virtus Equity & Convertible Income Fund (NIE) at 4.42%. This indicates that BST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSTNIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.75%

4.42%

+5.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.86%

9.60%

+7.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.44%

11.89%

+7.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.81%

17.59%

+6.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.83%

19.78%

+6.05%

Dividends

BST vs. NIE - Dividend Comparison

BST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.79%, more than NIE's 7.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BST
BlackRock Science and Technology Trust
8.79%10.36%8.21%8.91%10.57%5.38%3.85%10.52%6.41%4.80%6.69%6.93%
NIE
Virtus Equity & Convertible Income Fund
7.62%10.14%8.11%9.56%21.81%10.86%5.37%6.71%8.20%7.19%8.25%8.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


BST and NIE have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BST has higher volatility (9.75%) compared to NIE (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BST dropped -47.72% vs NIE's -57.90%.

BST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BST and NIE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer