BSOL vs. BTCZ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BSOL (Bitwise Solana Staking ETF) and BTCZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. BSOL is passively managed, while BTCZ is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.90, they often move in opposite directions. BSOL charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BTCZ.

Performance

BSOL vs. BTCZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise Solana Staking ETF (BSOL) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSOL achieves a -43.17% return, which is significantly lower than BTCZ's 40.86% return.

BSOL

• 1D: -5.48%
• 1M: -18.32%
• YTD: -43.17%
• 6M: -43.27%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BTCZ

• 1D: 6.37%
• 1M: 40.52%
• YTD: 40.86%
• 6M: 41.38%
• 1Y: 59.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSOL vs. BTCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BSOL Bitwise Solana Staking ETF	-43.17%	-38.11%
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF	40.86%	55.66%

Correlation

The correlation between BSOL and BTCZ is -0.90, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	-0.90

Return for Risk

BSOL vs. BTCZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSOL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BTCZ

BTCZ Risk / Return Rank: 24
BTCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
BTCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
BTCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 26
BTCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
BTCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSOL vs. BTCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Solana Staking ETF (BSOL) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BSOL	BTCZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.67	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.43	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.17	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.21	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	2.49	—

Drawdowns

BSOL vs. BTCZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSOL drawdown since its inception was -67.62%, smaller than the maximum BTCZ drawdown of -91.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSOL and BTCZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSOL	BTCZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.62%	-91.06%	+23.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-49.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-64.83%	-77.28%	+12.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-46.95%	-73.68%	+26.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	24.87%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BSOL	BTCZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	26.49%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	68.94%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	76.29%	88.72%	-12.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	76.29%	97.08%	-20.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	76.29%	97.08%	-20.79%

BSOL vs. BTCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSOL has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCZ's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

BSOL vs. BTCZ - Dividend Comparison

BSOL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BSOL Bitwise Solana Staking ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF	0.01%	0.02%	0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BSOL and BTCZ in my portfolio?

BSOL and BTCZ have a correlation of -0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BSOL or BTCZ?

On fees, BSOL is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BSOL or BTCZ?

BSOL is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BTCZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BSOL or BTCZ?

BTCZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for BSOL.

What is the main difference between BSOL and BTCZ?

They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for BSOL and 0.95% for BTCZ.