BSMZ vs. BSMQ
BSMZ (Invesco BulletShares 2035 Municipal Bond ETF) and BSMQ (Invesco BulletShares 2026 Municipal Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds from Invesco - BSMZ tracks the Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2035 Index while BSMQ tracks the Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2026 Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.18% expense ratio.
Performance
BSMZ vs. BSMQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSMZ achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly higher than BSMQ's 0.81% return.
BSMZ
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 0.85%
- YTD
- 1.78%
- 6M
- 2.27%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSMQ
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 0.81%
- 6M
- 1.18%
- 1Y
- 2.98%
- 3Y*
- 2.90%
- 5Y*
- 0.31%
- 10Y*
- —
BSMZ vs. BSMQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BSMZ Invesco BulletShares 2035 Municipal Bond ETF | 1.78% | 1.82% |
BSMQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Municipal Bond ETF | 0.81% | 0.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSMZ and BSMQ is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSMZ vs. BSMQ — Risk / Return Rank
BSMZ
BSMQ
BSMZ vs. BSMQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2035 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMZ) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSMZ | BSMQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.38 | 0.25 | +1.14 |
Drawdowns
BSMZ vs. BSMQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSMZ drawdown since its inception was -3.26%, smaller than the maximum BSMQ drawdown of -13.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMZ and BSMQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSMZ | BSMQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.26% | -13.18% | +9.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -2.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -11.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -0.05% | -0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.70% | -3.47% | +2.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.12% | — |
Volatility
BSMZ vs. BSMQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSMZ | BSMQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.40% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.94% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.76% | 1.33% | +2.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.76% | 2.68% | +1.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.76% | 4.79% | -1.03% |
BSMZ vs. BSMQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BSMZ and BSMQ have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BSMZ vs. BSMQ - Dividend Comparison
BSMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than BSMQ's 2.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSMQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Municipal Bond ETF | 2.76% | 2.74% | 2.75% | 2.47% | 1.60% | 1.14% | 1.57% | 0.44% |
BSMZ Invesco BulletShares 2035 Municipal Bond ETF | 2.02% | 0.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSMZ and BSMQ have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSMZ and BSMQ have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.
BSMQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 2.02% for BSMZ.
BSMZ tracks Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2035 Index, while BSMQ tracks Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2026 Index.
Find the right allocation for BSMZ and BSMQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer