BSMW vs. SPMO
BSMW (Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSMW is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2032 Index, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BSMW returned 3.20%/yr vs 43.04%/yr for SPMO. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BSMW charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
BSMW vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSMW achieves a 1.30% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 30.35% return.
BSMW
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 1.30%
- 6M
- 1.59%
- 1Y
- 6.93%
- 3Y*
- 3.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPMO
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 15.36%
- YTD
- 30.35%
- 6M
- 30.51%
- 1Y
- 46.00%
- 3Y*
- 43.04%
- 5Y*
- 24.29%
- 10Y*
- 20.95%
BSMW vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BSMW Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF | 1.30% | 3.42% | -0.35% | 7.00% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 30.35% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 23.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSMW and SPMO is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2023 | 0.04 |
The correlation between BSMW and SPMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (all time) to 0.15 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
BSMW vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BSMW
SPMO
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
BSMW
SPMO
Consumer Cyclical
BSMW
SPMO
Technology
BSMW
SPMO
Basic Materials
BSMW
-
SPMO
Communication Services
BSMW
-
SPMO
Consumer Defensive
BSMW
-
SPMO
Energy
BSMW
-
SPMO
Healthcare
BSMW
-
SPMO
Industrials
BSMW
-
SPMO
Real Estate
BSMW
-
SPMO
Utilities
BSMW
-
SPMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSMW vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
BSMW
SPMO
BSMW vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSMW | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.47 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.39 | 3.64 | -1.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.53 | 14.17 | -6.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSMW | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.48 | 2.62 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 1.01 | -0.32 |
Drawdowns
BSMW vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSMW drawdown since its inception was -7.57%, smaller than the maximum SPMO drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMW and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSMW | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.57% | -30.95% | +23.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.92% | -12.70% | +9.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.34% | -20.13% | +12.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.98% | 0.00% | -0.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.72% | -4.60% | +2.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 3.26% | -2.34% |
Volatility
BSMW vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW) is 0.93%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 7.35%. This indicates that BSMW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSMW | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.93% | 7.35% | -6.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.98% | 14.39% | -12.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.82% | 17.64% | -14.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.00% | 19.30% | -14.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.00% | 20.31% | -15.31% |
BSMW vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSMW has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BSMW vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
BSMW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, more than SPMO's 0.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSMW Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF | 3.20% | 3.24% | 3.48% | 2.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.65% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSMW and SPMO have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to BSMW (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSMW dropped -7.57% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
On 3-year performance, SPMO leads with 43.04% vs 3.20% for BSMW. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, BSMW has been the lower-risk option at 0.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 43.04% return vs 3.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for BSMW.
BSMW has the higher dividend yield at 3.20%, compared with 0.65% for SPMO.
BSMW is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while SPMO is Momentum. BSMW tracks Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2032 Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for BSMW and 0.13% for SPMO.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSMW and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer