PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSMW vs. SPMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSMW vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSMW achieves a 1.30% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 30.35% return.


BSMW

1D
0.11%
1M
0.55%
YTD
1.30%
6M
1.59%
1Y
6.93%
3Y*
3.20%
5Y*
10Y*

SPMO

1D
0.50%
1M
15.36%
YTD
30.35%
6M
30.51%
1Y
46.00%
3Y*
43.04%
5Y*
24.29%
10Y*
20.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSMW vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BSMW
Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF
1.30%3.42%-0.35%7.00%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
30.35%26.58%45.82%23.36%

Correlation

The correlation between BSMW and SPMO is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2023

0.04

The correlation between BSMW and SPMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (all time) to 0.15 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BSMW vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BSMW
SPMO

Financial Services

1.7%
5.9%

Consumer Cyclical

0.3%
1.3%

Technology

0.1%
52.6%

Basic Materials

-

1.6%

Communication Services

-

9.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.3%

Energy

-

3.4%

Healthcare

-

6.7%

Industrials

-

11.3%

Real Estate

-

1.0%

Utilities

-

2.8%

Financial Services

BSMW
1.7%
SPMO
5.9%

Consumer Cyclical

BSMW
0.3%
SPMO
1.3%

Technology

BSMW
0.1%
SPMO
52.6%

Basic Materials

BSMW

-

SPMO
1.6%

Communication Services

BSMW

-

SPMO
9.2%

Consumer Defensive

BSMW

-

SPMO
4.3%

Energy

BSMW

-

SPMO
3.4%

Healthcare

BSMW

-

SPMO
6.7%

Industrials

BSMW

-

SPMO
11.3%

Real Estate

BSMW

-

SPMO
1.0%

Utilities

BSMW

-

SPMO
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSMW vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSMW
BSMW Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
BSMW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSMW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSMW Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
BSMW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSMW Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSMW vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSMWSPMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.47

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

3.64

-1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.53

14.17

-6.63

BSMW vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSMW Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSMW and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSMWSPMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

2.62

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

1.01

-0.32

Drawdowns

BSMW vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSMW drawdown since its inception was -7.57%, smaller than the maximum SPMO drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMW and SPMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSMWSPMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.57%

-30.95%

+23.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.92%

-12.70%

+9.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.34%

-20.13%

+12.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.98%

0.00%

-0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.72%

-4.60%

+2.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

3.26%

-2.34%

Volatility

BSMW vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW) is 0.93%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 7.35%. This indicates that BSMW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSMWSPMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.93%

7.35%

-6.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.98%

14.39%

-12.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.82%

17.64%

-14.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.00%

19.30%

-14.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.00%

20.31%

-15.31%

BSMW vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSMW has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BSMW vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

BSMW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, more than SPMO's 0.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSMW
Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF
3.20%3.24%3.48%2.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.65%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSMW and SPMO have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPMO has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to BSMW (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSMW dropped -7.57% vs SPMO's -30.95%.

On 3-year performance, SPMO leads with 43.04% vs 3.20% for BSMW. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, BSMW has been the lower-risk option at 0.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 43.04% return vs 3.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for BSMW.

BSMW has the higher dividend yield at 3.20%, compared with 0.65% for SPMO.

BSMW is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while SPMO is Momentum. BSMW tracks Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2032 Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for BSMW and 0.13% for SPMO.

SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSMW and SPMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer