BSMW vs. SCMB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BSMW (Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF) and SCMB (Schwab Municipal Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds - BSMW tracks the Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2032 Index while SCMB tracks the ICE AMT-Free Core U.S. National Municipal Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BSMW returned 3.20%/yr vs 3.37%/yr for SCMB. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BSMW charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCMB.

Performance

BSMW vs. SCMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW) and Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSMW achieves a 1.30% return, which is significantly higher than SCMB's 1.07% return.

BSMW

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.55%
• YTD: 1.30%
• 6M: 1.59%
• 1Y: 6.93%
• 3Y*: 3.20%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCMB

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 0.60%
• YTD: 1.07%
• 6M: 1.55%
• 1Y: 6.86%
• 3Y*: 3.37%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSMW vs. SCMB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BSMW Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF	1.30%	3.42%	-0.35%	7.00%
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF	1.07%	3.78%	0.91%	5.90%

Correlation

The correlation between BSMW and SCMB is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2023	0.65

The correlation between BSMW and SCMB shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BSMW vs. SCMB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BSMW	SCMB
Financial Services	1.7%	8.9%
Consumer Cyclical	0.3%	2.6%
Technology	0.1%	0.9%
Basic Materials	-	0.0%
Communication Services	-	0.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.1%
Energy	-	0.0%
Healthcare	-	0.1%
Industrials	-	0.2%
Real Estate	-	3.4%
Utilities	-	0.2%

Return for Risk

BSMW vs. SCMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSMW

BSMW Risk / Return Rank: 67
BSMW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
BSMW Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
BSMW Omega Ratio Rank: 83
BSMW Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
BSMW Martin Ratio Rank: 46

SCMB

SCMB Risk / Return Rank: 64
SCMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
SCMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
SCMB Omega Ratio Rank: 81
SCMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
SCMB Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSMW vs. SCMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW) and Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BSMW	SCMB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.48	2.34	+0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.56	3.45	+0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.50	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.39	2.36	+0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.53	7.89	-0.36
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BSMW vs. SCMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSMW Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the SCMB Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSMW and SCMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BSMW	SCMB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.48	2.34	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.69	0.97	-0.28

Drawdowns

BSMW vs. SCMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSMW drawdown since its inception was -7.57%, which is greater than SCMB's maximum drawdown of -6.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMW and SCMB.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSMW	SCMB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.57%	-6.13%	-1.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.92%	-2.92%	0.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.34%	-5.57%	-1.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.98%	-0.87%	-0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.72%	-1.32%	-0.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.92%	0.87%	+0.05%

Volatility

BSMW vs. SCMB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW) is 0.93%, while Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB) has a volatility of 1.04%. This indicates that BSMW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BSMW	SCMB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.93%	1.04%	-0.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.98%	2.17%	-0.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.82%	2.94%	-0.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.00%	4.16%	+0.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.00%	4.16%	+0.84%

BSMW vs. SCMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSMW has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than SCMB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BSMW vs. SCMB - Dividend Comparison

BSMW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, less than SCMB's 3.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BSMW Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF	3.20%	3.24%	3.48%	2.36%	0.00%
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF	3.54%	3.36%	3.34%	3.10%	0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BSMW and SCMB in my portfolio?

BSMW and SCMB have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BSMW or SCMB?

SCMB has higher volatility (1.04%) compared to BSMW (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSMW dropped -7.57% vs SCMB's -6.13%.

Which ETF is better, BSMW or SCMB?

On 3-year performance, SCMB leads with 3.37% vs 3.20% for BSMW. On fees, SCMB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BSMW has been the lower-risk option at 0.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BSMW or SCMB?

Over the 3-year period, SCMB has performed better with a 3.37% return vs 3.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BSMW or SCMB?

SCMB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for BSMW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BSMW or SCMB?

SCMB has the higher dividend yield at 3.54%, compared with 3.20% for BSMW.

What is the main difference between BSMW and SCMB?

BSMW tracks Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2032 Index, while SCMB tracks ICE AMT-Free Core U.S. National Municipal Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for BSMW and 0.03% for SCMB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BSMW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.