BSMW vs. AMLP
BSMW (Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF) and AMLP (Alerian MLP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSMW is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2032 Index, while AMLP is a MLPs fund tracking the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BSMW returned 3.20%/yr vs 20.15%/yr for AMLP. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. BSMW charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for AMLP.
Performance
BSMW vs. AMLP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSMW achieves a 1.30% return, which is significantly lower than AMLP's 16.31% return.
BSMW
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 1.30%
- 6M
- 1.59%
- 1Y
- 6.93%
- 3Y*
- 3.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMLP
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -0.57%
- YTD
- 16.31%
- 6M
- 14.89%
- 1Y
- 17.06%
- 3Y*
- 20.15%
- 5Y*
- 16.90%
- 10Y*
- 6.76%
BSMW vs. AMLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BSMW Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF | 1.30% | 3.42% | -0.35% | 7.00% |
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 16.31% | 5.78% | 22.76% | 16.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSMW and AMLP is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2023 | -0.06 |
The correlation between BSMW and AMLP shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to -0.03 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
BSMW vs. AMLP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BSMW
AMLP
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
BSMW
AMLP
-
Consumer Cyclical
BSMW
AMLP
-
Technology
BSMW
AMLP
-
Basic Materials
BSMW
-
AMLP
-
Communication Services
BSMW
-
AMLP
-
Consumer Defensive
BSMW
-
AMLP
-
Energy
BSMW
-
AMLP
Healthcare
BSMW
-
AMLP
-
Industrials
BSMW
-
AMLP
-
Real Estate
BSMW
-
AMLP
-
Utilities
BSMW
-
AMLP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSMW vs. AMLP — Risk / Return Rank
BSMW
AMLP
BSMW vs. AMLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSMW | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.25 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.39 | 1.92 | +0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.53 | 6.37 | +1.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSMW | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.48 | 1.45 | +1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.22 | +0.47 |
Drawdowns
BSMW vs. AMLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSMW drawdown since its inception was -7.57%, smaller than the maximum AMLP drawdown of -77.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMW and AMLP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSMW | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.57% | -77.19% | +69.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.92% | -8.94% | +6.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.34% | -14.27% | +6.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -72.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.98% | -4.10% | +3.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.72% | -17.40% | +15.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 2.68% | -1.76% |
Volatility
BSMW vs. AMLP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW) is 0.93%, while Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) has a volatility of 4.91%. This indicates that BSMW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSMW | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.93% | 4.91% | -3.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.98% | 8.66% | -6.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.82% | 11.90% | -9.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.00% | 19.98% | -14.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.00% | 27.68% | -22.68% |
BSMW vs. AMLP - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSMW has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than AMLP's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSMW vs. AMLP - Dividend Comparison
BSMW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, less than AMLP's 7.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 7.64% | 8.36% | 7.70% | 7.86% | 7.70% | 8.55% | 12.31% | 9.12% | 9.29% | 7.97% | 8.09% | 9.84% |
BSMW Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF | 3.20% | 3.24% | 3.48% | 2.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSMW and AMLP have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMLP has higher volatility (4.91%) compared to BSMW (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSMW dropped -7.57% vs AMLP's -77.19%.
On 3-year performance, AMLP leads with 20.15% vs 3.20% for BSMW. On fees, BSMW is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BSMW has been the lower-risk option at 0.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, AMLP has performed better with a 20.15% return vs 3.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSMW is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for AMLP.
AMLP has the higher dividend yield at 7.64%, compared with 3.20% for BSMW.
BSMW is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while AMLP is MLPs. BSMW tracks Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2032 Index, while AMLP tracks Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for BSMW and 0.90% for AMLP.
BSMW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSMW and AMLP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer