BSMT vs. IVEP

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

BSMT (Invesco BulletShares 2029 Municipal Bond ETF) and IVEP (Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSMT is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2029 Index, while IVEP is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BSMT charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for IVEP.

Performance

BSMT vs. IVEP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2029 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMT) and Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF (IVEP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BSMT

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 0.58%
• YTD: 0.82%
• 6M: 0.99%
• 1Y: 4.40%
• 3Y*: 2.81%
• 5Y*: -0.13%
• 10Y*: —

IVEP

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: -0.97%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSMT vs. IVEP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BSMT Invesco BulletShares 2029 Municipal Bond ETF	0.42%
IVEP Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF	7.21%

Correlation

The correlation between BSMT and IVEP is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2026	0.31

Return for Risk

BSMT vs. IVEP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSMT

BSMT Risk / Return Rank: 78
BSMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
BSMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
BSMT Omega Ratio Rank: 92
BSMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
BSMT Martin Ratio Rank: 56

IVEP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSMT vs. IVEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2029 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMT) and Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF (IVEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BSMT	IVEP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.45	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.93	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.77	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.76	—	—

Drawdowns

BSMT vs. IVEP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSMT drawdown since its inception was -16.20%, which is greater than IVEP's maximum drawdown of -10.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMT and IVEP.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSMT	IVEP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.20%	-10.90%	-5.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.60%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.79%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.20%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.20%	-3.97%	+1.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.61%	-2.80%	-2.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.50%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BSMT	IVEP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.62%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.22%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.80%	29.06%	-27.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.24%	29.06%	-24.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.39%	29.06%	-22.67%

BSMT vs. IVEP - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSMT has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than IVEP's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BSMT vs. IVEP - Dividend Comparison

BSMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, while IVEP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BSMT Invesco BulletShares 2029 Municipal Bond ETF	2.74%	2.78%	2.80%	2.62%	1.65%	1.31%	1.82%	0.48%
IVEP Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BSMT and IVEP in my portfolio?

BSMT and IVEP have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BSMT or IVEP?

On fees, BSMT is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BSMT or IVEP?

BSMT is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IVEP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BSMT or IVEP?

BSMT has the higher dividend yield at 2.74%, compared with 0.00% for IVEP.

What is the main difference between BSMT and IVEP?

BSMT is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while IVEP is Industrials Equities. BSMT tracks Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2029 Index, while IVEP tracks Solactive Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Wedbush. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for BSMT and 0.75% for IVEP.