BSMS vs. ORBX
BSMS (Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF) and ORBX (Global X Space Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSMS is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2028 Index, while ORBX is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the Global X Space Tech Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BSMS charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for ORBX.
Performance
BSMS vs. ORBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BSMS
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 1.20%
- 1Y
- 4.26%
- 3Y*
- 3.05%
- 5Y*
- 0.07%
- 10Y*
- —
ORBX
- 1D
- -7.31%
- 1M
- 23.50%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSMS vs. ORBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BSMS Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF | 0.16% |
ORBX Global X Space Tech ETF | 22.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSMS and ORBX is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2026 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSMS vs. ORBX — Risk / Return Rank
BSMS
ORBX
BSMS vs. ORBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMS) and Global X Space Tech ETF (ORBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSMS | ORBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.08 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.81 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSMS | ORBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 4.31 | -4.12 |
Drawdowns
BSMS vs. ORBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSMS drawdown since its inception was -14.95%, smaller than the maximum ORBX drawdown of -18.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMS and ORBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSMS | ORBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.95% | -18.53% | +3.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.09% | -18.53% | +17.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.97% | -5.01% | +0.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.36% | — | — |
Volatility
BSMS vs. ORBX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSMS | ORBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.50% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.91% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50% | 79.41% | -77.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.60% | 79.41% | -75.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.21% | 79.41% | -73.20% |
BSMS vs. ORBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSMS has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than ORBX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSMS vs. ORBX - Dividend Comparison
BSMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, while ORBX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSMS Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF | 2.77% | 2.79% | 2.81% | 2.58% | 1.56% | 1.49% | 1.61% | 0.46% |
ORBX Global X Space Tech ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSMS and ORBX have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BSMS is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSMS is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for ORBX.
BSMS has the higher dividend yield at 2.77%, compared with 0.00% for ORBX.
BSMS is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while ORBX is Aerospace & Defense. BSMS tracks Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2028 Index, while ORBX tracks Global X Space Tech Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for BSMS and 0.50% for ORBX.
Find the right allocation for BSMS and ORBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer