BSMS vs. IVEP
BSMS (Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF) and IVEP (Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSMS is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2028 Index, while IVEP is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BSMS charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for IVEP.
Performance
BSMS vs. IVEP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BSMS
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 1.20%
- 1Y
- 4.26%
- 3Y*
- 3.05%
- 5Y*
- 0.07%
- 10Y*
- —
IVEP
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -1.63%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSMS vs. IVEP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BSMS Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF | 0.25% |
IVEP Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF | 8.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSMS and IVEP is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2026 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSMS vs. IVEP — Risk / Return Rank
BSMS
IVEP
BSMS vs. IVEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMS) and Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF (IVEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSMS | IVEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.08 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.81 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSMS | IVEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 2.62 | -2.43 |
Drawdowns
BSMS vs. IVEP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSMS drawdown since its inception was -14.95%, which is greater than IVEP's maximum drawdown of -7.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMS and IVEP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSMS | IVEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.95% | -7.34% | -7.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.09% | -3.31% | +2.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.97% | -1.97% | -3.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.36% | — | — |
Volatility
BSMS vs. IVEP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSMS | IVEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.50% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.91% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50% | 26.29% | -24.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.60% | 26.29% | -22.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.21% | 26.29% | -20.08% |
BSMS vs. IVEP - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSMS has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than IVEP's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSMS vs. IVEP - Dividend Comparison
BSMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, while IVEP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSMS Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF | 2.77% | 2.79% | 2.81% | 2.58% | 1.56% | 1.49% | 1.61% | 0.46% |
IVEP Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSMS and IVEP have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BSMS is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSMS is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IVEP.
BSMS has the higher dividend yield at 2.77%, compared with 0.00% for IVEP.
BSMS is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while IVEP is Industrials Equities. BSMS tracks Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2028 Index, while IVEP tracks Solactive Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Wedbush. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for BSMS and 0.75% for IVEP.
Find the right allocation for BSMS and IVEP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer