PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSMR vs. HYMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSMR vs. HYMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMR) and SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSMR achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly lower than HYMB's 2.87% return.


BSMR

1D
0.10%
1M
0.28%
YTD
0.99%
6M
1.26%
1Y
4.15%
3Y*
3.02%
5Y*
0.49%
10Y*

HYMB

1D
-0.04%
1M
1.19%
YTD
2.87%
6M
3.18%
1Y
7.43%
3Y*
5.09%
5Y*
0.42%
10Y*
2.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSMR vs. HYMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BSMR
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF
0.99%3.10%1.51%4.47%-7.60%1.09%4.97%0.16%
HYMB
SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF
2.87%2.04%5.52%7.73%-15.54%5.16%3.74%0.74%

Correlation

The correlation between BSMR and HYMB is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.55

The correlation between BSMR and HYMB shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BSMR vs. HYMB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BSMR
HYMB

Financial Services

1.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

100.0%

Financial Services

BSMR
1.9%
HYMB

-

Consumer Cyclical

BSMR
0.0%
HYMB

-

Basic Materials

BSMR

-

HYMB

-

Communication Services

BSMR

-

HYMB

-

Consumer Defensive

BSMR

-

HYMB

-

Energy

BSMR

-

HYMB

-

Healthcare

BSMR

-

HYMB

-

Industrials

BSMR

-

HYMB

-

Real Estate

BSMR

-

HYMB

-

Technology

BSMR

-

HYMB

-

Utilities

BSMR

-

HYMB
100.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSMR vs. HYMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSMR
BSMR Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
BSMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSMR Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
BSMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSMR Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

HYMB
HYMB Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
HYMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYMB Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
HYMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYMB Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSMR vs. HYMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMR) and SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSMRHYMBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.33

1.84

+1.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.56

2.63

+2.93

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.74

1.37

+0.36

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

7.29

2.40

+4.89

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

23.18

8.51

+14.67

BSMR vs. HYMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSMR Sharpe Ratio is 3.33, which is higher than the HYMB Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSMR and HYMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSMRHYMBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.33

1.84

+1.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.06

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.45

-0.24

Drawdowns

BSMR vs. HYMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSMR drawdown since its inception was -13.49%, smaller than the maximum HYMB drawdown of -29.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMR and HYMB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSMRHYMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.49%

-29.57%

+16.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.57%

-3.11%

+2.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.50%

-7.44%

+3.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.02%

-20.15%

+8.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.00%

-0.04%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.49%

-3.81%

+0.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.18%

0.88%

-0.70%

Volatility

BSMR vs. HYMB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMR) is 0.36%, while SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB) has a volatility of 1.35%. This indicates that BSMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSMRHYMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.36%

1.35%

-0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.92%

3.14%

-2.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25%

4.05%

-2.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.03%

6.66%

-3.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.73%

11.36%

-5.63%

BSMR vs. HYMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSMR has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than HYMB's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSMR vs. HYMB - Dividend Comparison

BSMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, less than HYMB's 4.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSMR
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF
2.72%2.77%2.78%2.72%1.40%1.00%1.49%0.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HYMB
SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF
4.54%4.55%4.29%4.07%3.77%3.19%3.55%3.95%4.03%3.78%4.08%4.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSMR and HYMB have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYMB has higher volatility (1.35%) compared to BSMR (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSMR dropped -13.49% vs HYMB's -29.57%.

On 5-year performance, BSMR leads with 0.49% vs 0.42% for HYMB. On fees, BSMR is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BSMR has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BSMR has performed better with a 0.49% return vs 0.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSMR is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for HYMB.

HYMB has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 2.72% for BSMR.

BSMR tracks Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2027 Index, while HYMB tracks Bloomberg Municipal Yield. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for BSMR and 0.35% for HYMB.

BSMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSMR and HYMB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer