BSMR vs. BOBP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BSMR (Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF) and BOBP (CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSMR is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2027 Index, while BOBP is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BSMR returned 4.16% vs 34.52% for BOBP. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BSMR charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for BOBP.

Performance

BSMR vs. BOBP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMR) and CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF (BOBP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSMR achieves a 1.04% return, which is significantly lower than BOBP's 24.96% return.

BSMR

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 0.41%
• YTD: 1.04%
• 6M: 1.31%
• 1Y: 4.16%
• 3Y*: 3.03%
• 5Y*: 0.48%
• 10Y*: —

BOBP

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: 9.07%
• YTD: 24.96%
• 6M: 24.49%
• 1Y: 34.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSMR vs. BOBP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BSMR Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF	1.04%	3.41%
BOBP CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF	24.96%	8.50%

Correlation

The correlation between BSMR and BOBP is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2025	0.12

BSMR vs. BOBP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BSMR	BOBP
Financial Services	1.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.0%	1.4%
Basic Materials	-	10.9%
Communication Services	-	3.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	2.8%
Energy	-	3.7%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	32.0%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	40.7%
Utilities	-	4.7%

Return for Risk

BSMR vs. BOBP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSMR

BSMR Risk / Return Rank: 94
BSMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
BSMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
BSMR Omega Ratio Rank: 95
BSMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
BSMR Martin Ratio Rank: 92

BOBP

BOBP Risk / Return Rank: 57
BOBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
BOBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
BOBP Omega Ratio Rank: 57
BOBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
BOBP Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSMR vs. BOBP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMR) and CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF (BOBP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BSMR	BOBP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.33	1.88	+1.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.57	2.58	+3.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.74	1.34	+0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.37	2.65	+4.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	23.41	11.75	+11.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BSMR vs. BOBP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSMR Sharpe Ratio is 3.33, which is higher than the BOBP Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSMR and BOBP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BSMR	BOBP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.33	1.88	+1.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	1.89	-1.68

Drawdowns

BSMR vs. BOBP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSMR drawdown since its inception was -13.49%, roughly equal to the maximum BOBP drawdown of -13.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMR and BOBP.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSMR	BOBP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.49%	-13.06%	-0.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.57%	-13.06%	+12.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.50%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.02%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.49%	-1.63%	-1.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.18%	2.95%	-2.77%

Volatility

BSMR vs. BOBP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMR) is 0.34%, while CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF (BOBP) has a volatility of 7.11%. This indicates that BSMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOBP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BSMR	BOBP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.34%	7.11%	-6.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.92%	16.31%	-15.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.25%	18.46%	-17.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.03%	18.27%	-15.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.72%	18.27%	-12.55%

BSMR vs. BOBP - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSMR has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than BOBP's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

BSMR vs. BOBP - Dividend Comparison

BSMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, more than BOBP's 2.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BOBP CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF	2.65%	3.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BSMR Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF	2.72%	2.77%	2.78%	2.72%	1.40%	1.00%	1.49%	0.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BSMR and BOBP in my portfolio?

BSMR and BOBP have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BSMR or BOBP?

BOBP has higher volatility (7.11%) compared to BSMR (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSMR dropped -13.49% vs BOBP's -13.06%.

Which ETF is better, BSMR or BOBP?

On 1-year performance, BOBP leads with 34.52% vs 4.16% for BSMR. On fees, BSMR is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BSMR has been the lower-risk option at 0.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BSMR or BOBP?

Over the 1-year period, BOBP has performed better with a 34.52% return vs 4.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BSMR or BOBP?

BSMR is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for BOBP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BSMR or BOBP?

BSMR has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 2.65% for BOBP.

What is the main difference between BSMR and BOBP?

BSMR is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while BOBP is Large Cap Blend Equities. BSMR tracks Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2027 Index, while BOBP tracks CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for BSMR and 0.70% for BOBP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BSMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.