PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSMQ vs. FMUN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BSMQ vs. FMUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2026 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMQ) and Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF (FMUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BSMQ vs. FMUN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSMQ achieves a 0.55% return, which is significantly higher than FMUN's -0.17% return.


BSMQ

1D
-0.06%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
0.55%
6M
1.43%
1Y
2.72%
3Y*
2.48%
5Y*
0.49%
10Y*

FMUN

1D
0.23%
1M
-2.22%
YTD
-0.17%
6M
1.37%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BSMQ vs. FMUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSMQ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than FMUN's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

BSMQ vs. FMUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSMQ
BSMQ Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
BSMQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSMQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSMQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
BSMQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSMQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

FMUN
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSMQ vs. FMUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2026 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMQ) and Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF (FMUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSMQFMUNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.93

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.71

BSMQ vs. FMUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSMQFMUNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

1.00

-0.76

Correlation

The correlation between BSMQ and FMUN is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BSMQ vs. FMUN - Dividend Comparison

BSMQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, less than FMUN's 3.25% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
BSMQ
Invesco BulletShares 2026 Municipal Bond ETF
2.77%2.74%2.75%2.47%1.60%1.14%1.57%0.44%
FMUN
Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF
3.25%2.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BSMQ vs. FMUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSMQ drawdown since its inception was -13.18%, which is greater than FMUN's maximum drawdown of -3.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMQ and FMUN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BSMQFMUNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.18%

-3.21%

-9.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-2.49%

+2.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.56%

-0.67%

-2.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

Volatility

BSMQ vs. FMUN - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BSMQFMUNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92%

4.16%

-2.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.68%

4.16%

-1.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.85%

4.16%

+0.69%