PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSMIX vs. TISBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSMIX vs. TISBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell Small/Mid-Cap Index Fund (BSMIX) and TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund (TISBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSMIX achieves a 18.24% return, which is significantly higher than TISBX's 17.14% return. Over the past 10 years, BSMIX has outperformed TISBX with an annualized return of 11.69%, while TISBX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.94% annualized return.


BSMIX

1D
-0.69%
1M
2.86%
YTD
18.24%
6M
17.38%
1Y
36.19%
3Y*
18.52%
5Y*
7.57%
10Y*
11.69%

TISBX

1D
-1.30%
1M
1.85%
YTD
17.14%
6M
14.97%
1Y
39.54%
3Y*
18.14%
5Y*
6.33%
10Y*
10.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSMIX vs. TISBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BSMIX
iShares Russell Small/Mid-Cap Index Fund
18.24%11.92%12.04%17.15%-18.39%18.00%20.28%27.62%-10.22%16.75%
TISBX
TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund
17.14%12.72%11.60%17.07%-20.31%14.85%20.14%25.61%-10.99%13.14%

Correlation

The correlation between BSMIX and TISBX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.98

The correlation between BSMIX and TISBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSMIX vs. TISBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSMIX
BSMIX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
BSMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
BSMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

TISBX
TISBX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
TISBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TISBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
TISBX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
TISBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
TISBX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSMIX vs. TISBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Small/Mid-Cap Index Fund (BSMIX) and TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund (TISBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSMIXTISBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.34

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.84

3.62

+0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.62

12.81

+1.81

BSMIX vs. TISBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSMIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the TISBX Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSMIX and TISBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSMIXTISBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

2.07

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.28

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.47

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.39

+0.17

Drawdowns

BSMIX vs. TISBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSMIX drawdown since its inception was -41.32%, smaller than the maximum TISBX drawdown of -56.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMIX and TISBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSMIXTISBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.32%

-56.50%

+15.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.39%

-10.95%

+1.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.49%

-27.44%

+1.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.33%

-31.89%

+3.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.32%

-41.69%

+0.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.69%

-1.43%

+0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.41%

-9.68%

+2.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

3.08%

-0.61%

Volatility

BSMIX vs. TISBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Russell Small/Mid-Cap Index Fund (BSMIX) is 5.17%, while TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund (TISBX) has a volatility of 5.74%. This indicates that BSMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TISBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSMIXTISBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.17%

5.74%

-0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.66%

13.65%

-0.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.23%

19.22%

-1.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.18%

22.56%

-1.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.71%

23.43%

-1.72%

BSMIX vs. TISBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSMIX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than TISBX's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BSMIX vs. TISBX - Dividend Comparison

BSMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, less than TISBX's 3.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSMIX
iShares Russell Small/Mid-Cap Index Fund
2.45%2.90%2.04%1.37%4.94%4.77%4.42%2.83%4.33%2.83%1.45%0.00%
TISBX
TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund
3.52%4.12%6.82%3.09%1.97%8.96%2.65%5.16%9.29%4.49%4.03%4.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, BSMIX and TISBX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TISBX has higher volatility (5.74%) compared to BSMIX (5.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSMIX dropped -41.32% vs TISBX's -56.50%.

BSMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSMIX and TISBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer