BSMC vs. AVSC
BSMC (Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF) and AVSC (Avantis US Small Cap Equity ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. BSMC is actively managed, while AVSC is passively managed. Over the past year, BSMC returned 24.26% vs 38.76% for AVSC. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BSMC charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AVSC.
Performance
BSMC vs. AVSC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSMC achieves a 9.25% return, which is significantly lower than AVSC's 16.85% return.
BSMC
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 9.25%
- 6M
- 9.99%
- 1Y
- 24.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVSC
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- 16.85%
- 6M
- 16.56%
- 1Y
- 38.76%
- 3Y*
- 17.09%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSMC vs. AVSC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BSMC Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF | 9.25% | 15.52% | 10.21% | 11.69% |
AVSC Avantis US Small Cap Equity ETF | 16.85% | 9.42% | 7.75% | 18.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSMC and AVSC is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2023 | 0.89 |
The correlation between BSMC and AVSC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
BSMC vs. AVSC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BSMC
AVSC
Healthcare
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
BSMC
AVSC
Industrials
BSMC
AVSC
Technology
BSMC
AVSC
Consumer Defensive
BSMC
AVSC
Financial Services
BSMC
AVSC
Energy
BSMC
AVSC
Consumer Cyclical
BSMC
AVSC
Communication Services
BSMC
AVSC
Basic Materials
BSMC
AVSC
Real Estate
BSMC
-
AVSC
Utilities
BSMC
-
AVSC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSMC vs. AVSC — Risk / Return Rank
BSMC
AVSC
BSMC vs. AVSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF (BSMC) and Avantis US Small Cap Equity ETF (AVSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSMC | AVSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.68 | 2.16 | -0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.50 | 3.09 | -0.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.37 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 4.93 | -2.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.57 | 15.33 | -5.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSMC | AVSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.68 | 2.16 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.13 | 0.40 | +0.73 |
Drawdowns
BSMC vs. AVSC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSMC drawdown since its inception was -19.15%, smaller than the maximum AVSC drawdown of -28.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMC and AVSC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSMC | AVSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.15% | -28.40% | +9.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.02% | -7.89% | -1.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -28.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.95% | -1.32% | -0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.68% | -7.37% | +4.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.54% | 2.54% | 0.00% |
Volatility
BSMC vs. AVSC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF (BSMC) is 3.97%, while Avantis US Small Cap Equity ETF (AVSC) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that BSMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSMC | AVSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.97% | 4.49% | -0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.06% | 11.71% | -1.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.52% | 18.10% | -3.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.09% | 22.34% | -6.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.09% | 22.34% | -6.25% |
BSMC vs. AVSC - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSMC has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than AVSC's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSMC vs. AVSC - Dividend Comparison
BSMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, more than AVSC's 0.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVSC Avantis US Small Cap Equity ETF | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.17% | 1.42% | 1.10% |
BSMC Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF | 0.95% | 1.17% | 1.02% | 0.15% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSMC and AVSC have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVSC has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to BSMC (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSMC dropped -19.15% vs AVSC's -28.40%.
On 1-year performance, AVSC leads with 38.76% vs 24.26% for BSMC. On fees, AVSC is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, BSMC has been the lower-risk option at 3.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AVSC has performed better with a 38.76% return vs 24.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVSC is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for BSMC.
BSMC has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.92% for AVSC.
They also come from different issuers: Brandes and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for BSMC and 0.25% for AVSC.
AVSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSMC and AVSC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer