PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSMAX vs. HFCGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSMAX vs. HFCGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell Small/Mid-Cap Index Fund Investor A Shares (BSMAX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSMAX achieves a 19.75% return, which is significantly higher than HFCGX's 13.40% return. Over the past 10 years, BSMAX has underperformed HFCGX with an annualized return of 11.09%, while HFCGX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.00% annualized return.


BSMAX

1D
0.69%
1M
-1.62%
6M
12.24%
YTD
19.75%
1Y
28.41%
3Y*
15.56%
5Y*
7.90%
10Y*
11.09%
ALL TIME*
10.40%

HFCGX

1D
-0.32%
1M
0.88%
6M
9.02%
YTD
13.40%
1Y
19.72%
3Y*
18.78%
5Y*
14.32%
10Y*
12.00%
ALL TIME*
9.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BSMAX vs. HFCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BSMAX
iShares Russell Small/Mid-Cap Index Fund Investor A Shares
19.75%11.59%11.78%16.81%-18.58%17.69%20.06%27.38%-10.45%16.40%
HFCGX
Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund
13.40%4.78%31.45%19.58%-4.97%29.94%17.73%20.70%-21.39%16.60%

Correlation

The correlation between BSMAX and HFCGX is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2015

0.86

The correlation between BSMAX and HFCGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSMAX vs. HFCGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSMAX
BSMAX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
BSMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
BSMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

HFCGX
HFCGX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
HFCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
HFCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSMAX vs. HFCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Small/Mid-Cap Index Fund Investor A Shares (BSMAX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BSMAXHFCGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.23

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

2.40

+0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.22

6.84

+4.39

BSMAX vs. HFCGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSMAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the HFCGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSMAX and HFCGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BSMAX vs. HFCGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSMAX drawdown since its inception was -41.38%, smaller than the maximum HFCGX drawdown of -62.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMAX and HFCGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSMAXHFCGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.38%

-62.35%

+20.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.46%

-7.82%

-1.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.54%

-22.86%

-2.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.48%

-26.30%

-2.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.38%

-54.22%

+12.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.28%

-3.27%

+0.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.63%

-15.17%

+7.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

2.75%

-0.23%

Volatility

BSMAX vs. HFCGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Russell Small/Mid-Cap Index Fund Investor A Shares (BSMAX) is 3.46%, while Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX) has a volatility of 5.04%. This indicates that BSMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HFCGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSMAXHFCGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

5.04%

-1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.41%

11.24%

+2.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.77%

14.01%

+3.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.98%

23.82%

-2.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.58%

25.86%

-4.28%

BSMAX vs. HFCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSMAX has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than HFCGX's 1.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSMAX vs. HFCGX - Dividend Comparison

BSMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, while HFCGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSMAX
iShares Russell Small/Mid-Cap Index Fund Investor A Shares
1.99%2.67%1.79%1.14%4.67%4.55%4.26%2.62%4.07%2.61%1.34%0.59%
HFCGX
Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%14.11%0.38%3.58%26.58%0.00%0.00%10.47%0.00%0.00%0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSMAX and HFCGX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HFCGX has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to BSMAX (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSMAX dropped -41.38% vs HFCGX's -62.35%.

BSMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSMAX and HFCGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer