BSL vs. CCLFX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

BSL (Blackstone Senior Floating Rate 2027 Term Fund) and CCLFX (Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund Class I Shares) are both mutual funds - BSL is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Blackstone, while CCLFX is a Bank Loan fund managed by Cliffwater. Over the past 5 years, BSL returned 3.93%/yr vs 8.72%/yr for CCLFX. Their 0.08 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BSL charges 1.50%/yr vs 3.27%/yr for CCLFX.

Performance

BSL vs. CCLFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackstone Senior Floating Rate 2027 Term Fund (BSL) and Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund Class I Shares (CCLFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSL achieves a 0.40% return, which is significantly lower than CCLFX's 3.28% return.

BSL

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: 0.91%
• 6M: 1.38%
• YTD: 0.40%
• 1Y: -0.34%
• 3Y*: 9.25%
• 5Y*: 3.93%
• 10Y*: 5.63%
• ALL TIME*: 4.83%

CCLFX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.49%
• 6M: 2.89%
• YTD: 3.28%
• 1Y: 6.75%
• 3Y*: 10.13%
• 5Y*: 8.72%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BSL Blackstone Senior Floating Rate 2027 Term Fund	$477.30K	$450.32K	$483.93K
CCLFX Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund Class I Shares	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

BSL vs. CCLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BSL Blackstone Senior Floating Rate 2027 Term Fund	0.40%	2.15%	18.16%	20.03%	-22.88%	28.33%	-4.44%	1.62%
CCLFX Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund Class I Shares	3.28%	8.93%	12.62%	12.66%	2.32%	10.38%	8.73%	2.12%

Correlation

The correlation between BSL and CCLFX is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.08
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.09
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2019	0.08

Return for Risk

BSL vs. CCLFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BSL

BSL Risk / Return Rank: 3
BSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
BSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
BSL Omega Ratio Rank: 3
BSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
BSL Martin Ratio Rank: 4

CCLFX

CCLFX Risk / Return Rank: 100
CCLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CCLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
CCLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 100
CCLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CCLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BSL vs. CCLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackstone Senior Floating Rate 2027 Term Fund (BSL) and Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund Class I Shares (CCLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BSL	CCLFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.05	8.10	-8.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.03	18.45	-18.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	6.72	-5.72
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.04	35.94	-35.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.10	197.36	-197.46

BSL vs. CCLFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSL Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the CCLFX Sharpe Ratio of 8.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSL and CCLFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BSL vs. CCLFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSL drawdown since its inception was -43.83%, which is greater than CCLFX's maximum drawdown of -3.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSL and CCLFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSL	CCLFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.83%	-3.91%	-39.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.86%	-0.19%	-7.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.86%	-0.46%	-7.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.48%	-2.25%	-22.23%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.83%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.06%	0.00%	-2.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.31%	-0.16%	-7.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.46%	0.03%	+3.43%

Volatility

BSL vs. CCLFX - Volatility Comparison

Blackstone Senior Floating Rate 2027 Term Fund (BSL) has a higher volatility of 1.18% compared to Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund Class I Shares (CCLFX) at 0.20%. This indicates that BSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BSL	CCLFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.18%	0.20%	+0.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.04%	0.63%	+4.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.53%	0.85%	+5.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.44%	1.73%	+8.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.35%	1.86%	+14.49%

BSL vs. CCLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is lower than CCLFX's 3.27% expense ratio.

Dividends

BSL vs. CCLFX - Dividend Comparison

BSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.23%, less than CCLFX's 10.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BSL Blackstone Senior Floating Rate 2027 Term Fund	8.23%	8.45%	9.46%	10.76%	6.89%	5.75%	7.65%	8.15%	9.21%	5.93%	5.86%	7.27%
CCLFX Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund Class I Shares	10.08%	10.47%	11.27%	10.96%	3.96%	7.03%	6.90%	0.61%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BSL and CCLFX in my portfolio?

BSL and CCLFX have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BSL or CCLFX?

BSL has higher volatility (1.18%) compared to CCLFX (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSL dropped -43.83% vs CCLFX's -3.91%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CCLFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.10 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.