PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSJX vs. LDRH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSJX vs. LDRH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2033 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJX) and iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSJX achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly lower than LDRH's 1.88% return.


BSJX

1D
0.06%
1M
0.23%
YTD
1.24%
6M
1.61%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LDRH

1D
0.08%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.88%
6M
2.45%
1Y
6.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSJX vs. LDRH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BSJX and LDRH is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025

0.83

BSJX vs. LDRH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BSJX
LDRH

Energy

9.6%
100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

8.2%

-

Technology

6.3%

-

Industrials

6.1%

-

Communication Services

3.7%

-

Basic Materials

3.4%

-

Healthcare

3.1%

-

Financial Services

2.8%

-

Utilities

2.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.9%

-

Real Estate

1.3%

-

Energy

BSJX
9.6%
LDRH
100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

BSJX
8.2%
LDRH

-

Technology

BSJX
6.3%
LDRH

-

Industrials

BSJX
6.1%
LDRH

-

Communication Services

BSJX
3.7%
LDRH

-

Basic Materials

BSJX
3.4%
LDRH

-

Healthcare

BSJX
3.1%
LDRH

-

Financial Services

BSJX
2.8%
LDRH

-

Utilities

BSJX
2.7%
LDRH

-

Consumer Defensive

BSJX
1.9%
LDRH

-

Real Estate

BSJX
1.3%
LDRH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSJX vs. LDRH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSJX

LDRH
LDRH Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
LDRH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDRH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDRH Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
LDRH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDRH Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSJX vs. LDRH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2033 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJX) and iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BSJX vs. LDRH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSJXLDRHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.61

1.70

-0.09

Drawdowns

BSJX vs. LDRH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSJX drawdown since its inception was -3.40%, which is greater than LDRH's maximum drawdown of -3.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJX and LDRH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSJXLDRHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.40%

-3.17%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-0.12%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.44%

-0.24%

-0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.30%

Volatility

BSJX vs. LDRH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSJXLDRHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.31%

2.61%

+1.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.31%

3.51%

+0.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.31%

3.51%

+0.80%

BSJX vs. LDRH - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSJX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than LDRH's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSJX vs. LDRH - Dividend Comparison

BSJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.43%, less than LDRH's 6.99% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


BSJX and LDRH have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LDRH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LDRH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJX.

LDRH has the higher dividend yield at 6.99%, compared with 6.43% for BSJX.

BSJX tracks IVZ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2033 Index, while LDRH tracks BlackRock iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJX and 0.35% for LDRH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSJX and LDRH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer