BSJW vs. HYHG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BSJW (Invesco BulletShares 2032 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and HYHG (ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged) are both High Yield Bonds funds - BSJW tracks the Nasdaq BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2032 Index while HYHG tracks the Citi High Yield (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BSJW returned 6.85% vs 7.52% for HYHG. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BSJW charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HYHG.

Performance

BSJW vs. HYHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2032 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJW) and ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSJW achieves a 0.89% return, which is significantly lower than HYHG's 3.03% return.

BSJW

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 0.89%
• 6M: 1.41%
• 1Y: 6.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HYHG

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 0.64%
• YTD: 3.03%
• 6M: 3.57%
• 1Y: 7.52%
• 3Y*: 9.78%
• 5Y*: 6.99%
• 10Y*: 6.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSJW vs. HYHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BSJW Invesco BulletShares 2032 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	0.89%	9.85%	3.62%
HYHG ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged	3.03%	5.31%	6.19%

Correlation

The correlation between BSJW and HYHG is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2024	0.38

BSJW vs. HYHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BSJW	HYHG
Consumer Cyclical	9.3%	-
Energy	6.4%	-
Industrials	4.6%	-
Communication Services	4.0%	1.1%
Financial Services	3.5%	-
Healthcare	3.4%	0.6%
Technology	2.5%	-
Consumer Defensive	2.4%	-
Basic Materials	1.6%	-
Real Estate	1.2%	-
Utilities	0.9%	-

Return for Risk

BSJW vs. HYHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSJW

BSJW Risk / Return Rank: 51
BSJW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
BSJW Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
BSJW Omega Ratio Rank: 54
BSJW Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
BSJW Martin Ratio Rank: 57

HYHG

HYHG Risk / Return Rank: 52
HYHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
HYHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
HYHG Omega Ratio Rank: 38
HYHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
HYHG Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSJW vs. HYHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2032 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJW) and ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BSJW	HYHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	1.36	+0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.57	1.98	+0.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.24	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.13	3.74	-1.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.78	12.28	-2.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BSJW vs. HYHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSJW Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the HYHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSJW and HYHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BSJW	HYHG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.67	1.36	+0.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.86	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.67	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.43	0.46	+0.97

Drawdowns

BSJW vs. HYHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSJW drawdown since its inception was -4.52%, smaller than the maximum HYHG drawdown of -25.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJW and HYHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSJW	HYHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.52%	-25.71%	+21.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.22%	-2.02%	-1.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-7.47%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-9.21%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-25.71%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.16%	-0.32%	+0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.55%	-3.04%	+2.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.70%	0.61%	+0.09%

Volatility

BSJW vs. HYHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2032 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJW) is 1.22%, while ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG) has a volatility of 1.42%. This indicates that BSJW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BSJW	HYHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.22%	1.42%	-0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.26%	4.30%	-1.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.11%	5.56%	-1.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.11%	8.16%	-3.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.11%	9.15%	-4.04%

BSJW vs. HYHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSJW has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than HYHG's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

BSJW vs. HYHG - Dividend Comparison

BSJW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.65%, less than HYHG's 6.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BSJW Invesco BulletShares 2032 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	6.65%	6.36%	4.15%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HYHG ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged	6.78%	6.97%	6.57%	6.07%	5.58%	4.54%	5.21%	6.06%	6.45%	5.57%	5.37%	6.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BSJW and HYHG in my portfolio?

BSJW and HYHG have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BSJW or HYHG?

HYHG has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to BSJW (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSJW dropped -4.52% vs HYHG's -25.71%.

Which ETF is better, BSJW or HYHG?

On 1-year performance, HYHG leads with 7.52% vs 6.85% for BSJW. On fees, BSJW is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, BSJW has been the lower-risk option at 1.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BSJW or HYHG?

Over the 1-year period, HYHG has performed better with a 7.52% return vs 6.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BSJW or HYHG?

BSJW is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HYHG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BSJW or HYHG?

HYHG has the higher dividend yield at 6.78%, compared with 6.65% for BSJW.

What is the main difference between BSJW and HYHG?

BSJW tracks Nasdaq BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2032 Index, while HYHG tracks Citi High Yield (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJW and 0.50% for HYHG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BSJW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.