PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSJV vs. IBIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSJV vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2031 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJV) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSJV achieves a 1.38% return, which is significantly lower than IBIC's 2.33% return.


BSJV

1D
0.11%
1M
0.88%
YTD
1.38%
6M
2.00%
1Y
6.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBIC

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
2.33%
6M
2.45%
1Y
4.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSJV vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BSJV
Invesco BulletShares 2031 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.38%9.50%5.66%7.24%
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
2.33%4.96%5.25%2.23%

Correlation

The correlation between BSJV and IBIC is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2023

0.17

The correlation between BSJV and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSJV vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSJV
BSJV Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
BSJV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSJV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSJV Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
BSJV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSJV Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIC
IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSJV vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2031 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJV) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BSJVIBICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

2.23

-0.95

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

16.64

-14.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.64

59.19

-50.55

BSJV vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSJV Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 4.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSJV and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BSJV vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSJV drawdown since its inception was -5.22%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJV and IBIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSJVIBICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.22%

-0.90%

-4.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.21%

-0.27%

-2.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-0.17%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.78%

-0.10%

-0.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.75%

0.08%

+0.67%

Volatility

BSJV vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

Invesco BulletShares 2031 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJV) has a higher volatility of 1.37% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.22%. This indicates that BSJV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSJVIBICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.37%

0.22%

+1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.43%

0.67%

+2.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.39%

0.89%

+3.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.15%

1.57%

+4.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.15%

1.57%

+4.58%

BSJV vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSJV has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSJV vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

BSJV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.56%, more than IBIC's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BSJV
Invesco BulletShares 2031 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.56%6.52%6.67%1.62%
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
3.59%4.43%4.65%0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSJV and IBIC have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BSJV has higher volatility (1.37%) compared to IBIC (0.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSJV dropped -5.22% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

On 1-year performance, BSJV leads with 6.30% vs 4.32% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BSJV has performed better with a 6.30% return vs 4.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJV.

BSJV has the higher dividend yield at 6.56%, compared with 3.59% for IBIC.

BSJV is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. BSJV tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2031, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJV and 0.10% for IBIC.

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.99 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSJV and IBIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer