BSJU vs. IBHG
BSJU (Invesco Bulletshares 2030 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and IBHG (iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - BSJU tracks the Invesco BulletShares High Yield Corporate Bond 2030 Index while IBHG tracks the Bloomberg 2027 Term High Yield and Income Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BSJU returned 9.06%/yr vs 7.62%/yr for IBHG. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BSJU charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for IBHG.
Performance
BSJU vs. IBHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSJU achieves a 1.91% return, which is significantly higher than IBHG's 1.15% return.
BSJU
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 1.91%
- 6M
- 2.02%
- 1Y
- 6.57%
- 3Y*
- 9.06%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBHG
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 1.15%
- 6M
- 1.42%
- 1Y
- 4.38%
- 3Y*
- 7.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSJU vs. IBHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJU Invesco Bulletshares 2030 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.91% | 8.58% | 8.20% | 12.91% | -2.11% |
IBHG iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 1.15% | 6.90% | 7.42% | 11.27% | 0.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSJU and IBHG is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2022 | 0.85 |
The correlation between BSJU and IBHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSJU vs. IBHG — Risk / Return Rank
BSJU
IBHG
BSJU vs. IBHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bulletshares 2030 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJU) and iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BSJU | IBHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.40 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.61 | 6.06 | -3.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.07 | 22.04 | -9.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BSJU vs. IBHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSJU drawdown since its inception was -7.51%, smaller than the maximum IBHG drawdown of -13.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJU and IBHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSJU | IBHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.51% | -13.85% | +6.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.53% | -0.73% | -1.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.12% | -3.39% | -1.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -0.04% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.07% | -2.64% | +1.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.55% | 0.20% | +0.35% |
Volatility
BSJU vs. IBHG - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Bulletshares 2030 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJU) has a higher volatility of 1.04% compared to iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHG) at 0.40%. This indicates that BSJU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSJU | IBHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.04% | 0.40% | +0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.12% | 1.51% | +1.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.95% | 2.09% | +1.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.86% | 6.33% | +1.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.86% | 6.33% | +1.53% |
BSJU vs. IBHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSJU has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than IBHG's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSJU vs. IBHG - Dividend Comparison
BSJU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.65%, more than IBHG's 6.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJU Invesco Bulletshares 2030 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.65% | 6.52% | 7.08% | 6.74% | 2.38% | 0.00% |
IBHG iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 6.07% | 6.33% | 7.02% | 6.66% | 5.62% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSJU and IBHG have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BSJU has higher volatility (1.04%) compared to IBHG (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSJU dropped -7.51% vs IBHG's -13.85%.
On 3-year performance, BSJU leads with 9.06% vs 7.62% for IBHG. On fees, IBHG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IBHG has been the lower-risk option at 0.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BSJU has performed better with a 9.06% return vs 7.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBHG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJU.
BSJU has the higher dividend yield at 6.65%, compared with 6.07% for IBHG.
BSJU tracks Invesco BulletShares High Yield Corporate Bond 2030 Index, while IBHG tracks Bloomberg 2027 Term High Yield and Income Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJU and 0.35% for IBHG.
IBHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSJU and IBHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer