PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSJU vs. BSJQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSJU vs. BSJQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Bulletshares 2030 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJU) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF (BSJQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSJU achieves a 1.21% return, which is significantly higher than BSJQ's 0.85% return.


BSJU

1D
-0.43%
1M
-0.34%
YTD
1.21%
6M
1.59%
1Y
6.80%
3Y*
8.46%
5Y*
10Y*

BSJQ

1D
-0.04%
1M
-0.32%
YTD
0.85%
6M
1.13%
1Y
4.72%
3Y*
6.96%
5Y*
3.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSJU vs. BSJQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BSJU
Invesco Bulletshares 2030 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.21%8.58%8.20%12.91%-2.11%
BSJQ
Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF
0.85%6.59%7.49%9.83%-0.05%

Correlation

The correlation between BSJU and BSJQ is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2022

0.89

Over the past year, the correlation between BSJU and BSJQ has dropped to 0.64 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

BSJU vs. BSJQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BSJU
BSJQ

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
7.0%

Energy

7.8%
1.6%

Healthcare

5.2%

-

Financial Services

4.1%
39.0%

Industrials

3.2%
2.1%

Real Estate

3.2%
3.6%

Technology

3.0%
5.0%

Communication Services

2.4%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.0%

-

Basic Materials

1.9%

-

Utilities

1.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

BSJU
9.1%
BSJQ
7.0%

Energy

BSJU
7.8%
BSJQ
1.6%

Healthcare

BSJU
5.2%
BSJQ

-

Financial Services

BSJU
4.1%
BSJQ
39.0%

Industrials

BSJU
3.2%
BSJQ
2.1%

Real Estate

BSJU
3.2%
BSJQ
3.6%

Technology

BSJU
3.0%
BSJQ
5.0%

Communication Services

BSJU
2.4%
BSJQ
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

BSJU
2.0%
BSJQ

-

Basic Materials

BSJU
1.9%
BSJQ

-

Utilities

BSJU
1.0%
BSJQ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSJU vs. BSJQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSJU
BSJU Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
BSJU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSJU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSJU Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
BSJU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSJU Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

BSJQ
BSJQ Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
BSJQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSJQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSJQ Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
BSJQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSJQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSJU vs. BSJQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bulletshares 2030 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJU) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF (BSJQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSJUBSJQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.79

-0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

8.76

-6.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.57

40.52

-27.95

BSJU vs. BSJQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSJU Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is lower than the BSJQ Sharpe Ratio of 3.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSJU and BSJQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSJUBSJQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

3.45

-1.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.54

+0.43

Drawdowns

BSJU vs. BSJQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSJU drawdown since its inception was -7.51%, smaller than the maximum BSJQ drawdown of -24.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJU and BSJQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSJUBSJQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.51%

-24.13%

+16.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.53%

-0.54%

-1.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.12%

-2.66%

-2.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

-0.43%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.08%

-2.17%

+1.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.54%

0.12%

+0.42%

Volatility

BSJU vs. BSJQ - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Bulletshares 2030 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJU) has a higher volatility of 1.28% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF (BSJQ) at 0.54%. This indicates that BSJU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSJQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSJUBSJQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.28%

0.54%

+0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.09%

0.98%

+2.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.92%

1.38%

+2.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.90%

5.73%

+2.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.90%

8.44%

-0.54%

BSJU vs. BSJQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BSJU and BSJQ have an expense ratio of 0.42%.


Dividends

BSJU vs. BSJQ - Dividend Comparison

BSJU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.66%, more than BSJQ's 5.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BSJQ
Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF
5.83%6.10%6.58%6.58%5.58%4.27%4.64%4.59%2.39%
BSJU
Invesco Bulletshares 2030 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.66%6.52%7.08%6.74%2.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSJU and BSJQ have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BSJU has higher volatility (1.28%) compared to BSJQ (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSJU dropped -7.51% vs BSJQ's -24.13%.

On 3-year performance, BSJU leads with 8.46% vs 6.96% for BSJQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.42% expense ratio. On volatility, BSJQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BSJU has performed better with a 8.46% return vs 6.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSJU and BSJQ have the same expense ratio: 0.42% per year.

BSJU has the higher dividend yield at 6.66%, compared with 5.83% for BSJQ.

BSJU tracks Invesco BulletShares High Yield Corporate Bond 2030 Index, while BSJQ tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2026 TR Index.

BSJQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.45 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSJU and BSJQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer