PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSJT vs. HYZD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSJT vs. HYZD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJT) and WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund (HYZD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSJT achieves a 1.36% return, which is significantly lower than HYZD's 2.72% return.


BSJT

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.47%
YTD
1.36%
6M
1.17%
1Y
5.40%
3Y*
8.85%
5Y*
10Y*

HYZD

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.18%
YTD
2.72%
6M
2.83%
1Y
7.10%
3Y*
9.37%
5Y*
6.09%
10Y*
5.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSJT vs. HYZD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BSJT
Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.36%7.63%8.01%13.59%-14.85%-0.44%
HYZD
WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund
2.72%7.67%9.39%11.17%-2.35%1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between BSJT and HYZD is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2021

0.56

Over the past year, the correlation between BSJT and HYZD has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSJT vs. HYZD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSJT
BSJT Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
BSJT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSJT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSJT Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
BSJT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSJT Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

HYZD
HYZD Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
HYZD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYZD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYZD Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
HYZD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYZD Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSJT vs. HYZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJT) and WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund (HYZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BSJTHYZDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.48

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

3.73

-1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.37

15.97

-6.60

BSJT vs. HYZD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSJT Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the HYZD Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSJT and HYZD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BSJT vs. HYZD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSJT drawdown since its inception was -19.62%, smaller than the maximum HYZD drawdown of -25.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJT and HYZD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSJTHYZDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.62%

-25.66%

+6.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.47%

-1.91%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.59%

-5.85%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-0.40%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.38%

-2.19%

-3.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.58%

0.45%

+0.13%

Volatility

BSJT vs. HYZD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJT) is 0.87%, while WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund (HYZD) has a volatility of 1.12%. This indicates that BSJT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYZD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSJTHYZDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.87%

1.12%

-0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.66%

2.44%

+0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.68%

3.04%

+0.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.16%

6.71%

+1.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.16%

8.54%

-0.38%

BSJT vs. HYZD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSJT has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than HYZD's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSJT vs. HYZD - Dividend Comparison

BSJT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.69%, more than HYZD's 5.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSJT
Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.69%6.77%6.65%6.42%5.45%1.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HYZD
WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund
5.88%6.05%6.08%5.94%5.14%4.02%5.13%5.50%5.58%4.94%5.07%4.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSJT and HYZD have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYZD has higher volatility (1.12%) compared to BSJT (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSJT dropped -19.62% vs HYZD's -25.66%.

On 3-year performance, HYZD leads with 9.37% vs 8.85% for BSJT. On fees, BSJT is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, BSJT has been the lower-risk option at 0.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, HYZD has performed better with a 9.37% return vs 8.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSJT is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for HYZD.

BSJT has the higher dividend yield at 6.69%, compared with 5.88% for HYZD.

BSJT tracks Invesco BulletShares High Yield Corporate Bond 2029 Index, while HYZD tracks WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond, Zero Duration Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJT and 0.43% for HYZD.

HYZD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSJT and HYZD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer