PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSJT vs. BBHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSJT vs. BBHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJT) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSJT achieves a 1.33% return, which is significantly lower than BBHY's 1.73% return.


BSJT

1D
0.12%
1M
0.47%
YTD
1.33%
6M
1.89%
1Y
6.65%
3Y*
8.62%
5Y*
10Y*

BBHY

1D
0.15%
1M
0.49%
YTD
1.73%
6M
2.18%
1Y
7.10%
3Y*
8.76%
5Y*
4.12%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSJT vs. BBHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BSJT
Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.33%7.63%8.01%13.59%-14.85%-0.52%
BBHY
JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.73%8.51%7.81%11.98%-10.37%0.16%

Correlation

The correlation between BSJT and BBHY is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2021

0.86

The correlation between BSJT and BBHY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

BSJT vs. BBHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BSJT
BBHY

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
10.0%

Technology

7.2%
4.0%

Energy

6.7%
5.2%

Industrials

6.3%
8.4%

Communication Services

3.3%
7.9%

Real Estate

3.2%
3.9%

Financial Services

2.9%
4.1%

Basic Materials

2.8%
3.2%

Utilities

1.9%
2.0%

Healthcare

1.6%
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

1.2%
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

BSJT
9.0%
BBHY
10.0%

Technology

BSJT
7.2%
BBHY
4.0%

Energy

BSJT
6.7%
BBHY
5.2%

Industrials

BSJT
6.3%
BBHY
8.4%

Communication Services

BSJT
3.3%
BBHY
7.9%

Real Estate

BSJT
3.2%
BBHY
3.9%

Financial Services

BSJT
2.9%
BBHY
4.1%

Basic Materials

BSJT
2.8%
BBHY
3.2%

Utilities

BSJT
1.9%
BBHY
2.0%

Healthcare

BSJT
1.6%
BBHY
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

BSJT
1.2%
BBHY
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSJT vs. BBHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSJT
BSJT Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
BSJT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSJT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSJT Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BSJT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSJT Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

BBHY
BBHY Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BBHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBHY Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
BBHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBHY Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSJT vs. BBHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJT) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSJTBBHYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.39

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

3.00

-0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.54

13.50

-1.96

BSJT vs. BBHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSJT Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the BBHY Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSJT and BBHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSJTBBHYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

1.97

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.64

-0.31

Drawdowns

BSJT vs. BBHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSJT drawdown since its inception was -19.62%, smaller than the maximum BBHY drawdown of -24.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJT and BBHY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSJTBBHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.62%

-24.98%

+5.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.47%

-2.37%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.59%

-5.00%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-0.14%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.44%

-2.37%

-3.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.58%

0.53%

+0.05%

Volatility

BSJT vs. BBHY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJT) is 0.96%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY) has a volatility of 1.13%. This indicates that BSJT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSJTBBHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.96%

1.13%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.62%

2.85%

-0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.68%

3.62%

+0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.20%

7.26%

+0.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.20%

7.53%

+0.67%

BSJT vs. BBHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSJT has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than BBHY's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSJT vs. BBHY - Dividend Comparison

BSJT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.75%, less than BBHY's 6.94% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BBHY
JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.94%7.24%7.18%6.49%5.92%4.06%4.73%4.99%5.02%4.81%1.42%
BSJT
Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.75%6.77%6.65%6.42%5.45%1.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSJT and BBHY have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBHY has higher volatility (1.13%) compared to BSJT (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSJT dropped -19.62% vs BBHY's -24.98%.

On 3-year performance, BBHY leads with 8.76% vs 8.62% for BSJT. On fees, BBHY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BSJT has been the lower-risk option at 0.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BBHY has performed better with a 8.76% return vs 8.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBHY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJT.

BBHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.94%, compared with 6.75% for BSJT.

BSJT tracks Invesco BulletShares High Yield Corporate Bond 2029 Index, while BBHY tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJT and 0.15% for BBHY.

BBHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSJT and BBHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer