PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSJT vs. BBHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSJT vs. BBHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJT) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSJT achieves a 2.24% return, which is significantly lower than BBHY's 2.42% return.


BSJT

1D
0.26%
1M
0.68%
6M
1.79%
YTD
2.24%
1Y
5.28%
3Y*
8.41%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.80%

BBHY

1D
0.29%
1M
0.18%
6M
1.74%
YTD
2.42%
1Y
5.67%
3Y*
8.48%
5Y*
4.02%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.85M$3.12M$2.92M
$4.53M$4.17M$4.04M

BSJT vs. BBHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BSJT
Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
2.24%7.63%8.01%13.59%-14.85%-0.44%
BBHY
JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
2.42%8.51%7.81%11.98%-10.37%0.31%

Correlation

The correlation between BSJT and BBHY is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2021

0.86

The correlation between BSJT and BBHY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSJT vs. BBHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BSJT
BSJT Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
BSJT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSJT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSJT Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
BSJT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSJT Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

BBHY
BBHY Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
BBHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBHY Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
BBHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBHY Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BSJT vs. BBHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJT) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BSJTBBHYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.30

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

2.40

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.19

10.46

-1.27

BSJT vs. BBHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSJT Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the BBHY Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSJT and BBHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BSJT vs. BBHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSJT drawdown since its inception was -19.62%, smaller than the maximum BBHY drawdown of -24.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJT and BBHY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSJTBBHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.62%

-24.98%

+5.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.47%

-2.37%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.59%

-5.00%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.26%

-2.33%

-2.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.58%

0.54%

+0.04%

Volatility

BSJT vs. BBHY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJT) is 0.76%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY) has a volatility of 0.91%. This indicates that BSJT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSJTBBHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.76%

0.91%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.69%

3.04%

-0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.63%

3.67%

-0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.08%

7.27%

+0.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.08%

7.48%

+0.60%

BSJT vs. BBHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSJT has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than BBHY's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSJT vs. BBHY - Dividend Comparison

BSJT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.60%, less than BBHY's 7.09% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BBHY
JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
7.09%7.24%7.18%6.49%5.92%4.06%4.73%4.99%5.02%4.81%1.42%
BSJT
Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.60%6.77%6.65%6.42%5.45%1.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSJT and BBHY have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBHY has higher volatility (0.91%) compared to BSJT (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSJT dropped -19.62% vs BBHY's -24.98%.

On 3-year performance, BBHY leads with 8.48% vs 8.41% for BSJT. On fees, BBHY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BSJT has been the lower-risk option at 0.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BBHY has performed better with a 8.48% return vs 8.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBHY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJT.

BBHY has the higher dividend yield at 7.09%, compared with 6.60% for BSJT.

BSJT tracks Invesco BulletShares High Yield Corporate Bond 2029 Index, while BBHY tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJT and 0.15% for BBHY.

BBHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSJT and BBHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer