PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSJT vs. AVDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSJT vs. AVDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJT) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSJT achieves a 1.33% return, which is significantly lower than AVDV's 16.64% return.


BSJT

1D
0.12%
1M
0.47%
YTD
1.33%
6M
1.89%
1Y
6.65%
3Y*
8.62%
5Y*
10Y*

AVDV

1D
0.52%
1M
3.19%
YTD
16.64%
6M
20.05%
1Y
44.34%
3Y*
28.61%
5Y*
13.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSJT vs. AVDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BSJT
Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.33%7.63%8.01%13.59%-14.85%-0.52%
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
16.64%49.37%8.67%16.85%-11.47%-2.56%

Correlation

The correlation between BSJT and AVDV is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2021

0.58

The correlation between BSJT and AVDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

BSJT vs. AVDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BSJT
AVDV

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
14.4%

Technology

7.2%
6.4%

Energy

6.7%
10.8%

Industrials

6.3%
21.3%

Communication Services

3.3%
2.0%

Real Estate

3.2%
1.1%

Financial Services

2.9%
13.7%

Basic Materials

2.8%
22.5%

Utilities

1.9%
1.7%

Healthcare

1.6%
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

1.2%
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

BSJT
9.0%
AVDV
14.4%

Technology

BSJT
7.2%
AVDV
6.4%

Energy

BSJT
6.7%
AVDV
10.8%

Industrials

BSJT
6.3%
AVDV
21.3%

Communication Services

BSJT
3.3%
AVDV
2.0%

Real Estate

BSJT
3.2%
AVDV
1.1%

Financial Services

BSJT
2.9%
AVDV
13.7%

Basic Materials

BSJT
2.8%
AVDV
22.5%

Utilities

BSJT
1.9%
AVDV
1.7%

Healthcare

BSJT
1.6%
AVDV
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

BSJT
1.2%
AVDV
3.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSJT vs. AVDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSJT
BSJT Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
BSJT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSJT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSJT Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BSJT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSJT Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

AVDV
AVDV Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
AVDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
AVDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSJT vs. AVDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJT) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSJTAVDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.52

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

3.38

-0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.54

13.70

-2.17

BSJT vs. AVDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSJT Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is lower than the AVDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSJT and AVDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSJTAVDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

2.87

-1.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.80

-0.47

Drawdowns

BSJT vs. AVDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSJT drawdown since its inception was -19.62%, smaller than the maximum AVDV drawdown of -43.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJT and AVDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSJTAVDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.62%

-43.01%

+23.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.47%

-13.19%

+10.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.59%

-14.17%

+8.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-0.83%

+0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.44%

-6.77%

+1.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.58%

3.24%

-2.66%

Volatility

BSJT vs. AVDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJT) is 0.96%, while Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) has a volatility of 4.79%. This indicates that BSJT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSJTAVDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.96%

4.79%

-3.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.62%

13.07%

-10.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.68%

15.54%

-11.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.20%

17.29%

-9.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.20%

19.72%

-11.52%

BSJT vs. AVDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSJT has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than AVDV's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSJT vs. AVDV - Dividend Comparison

BSJT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.75%, more than AVDV's 2.73% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
2.73%3.05%4.31%3.29%3.17%2.39%1.67%0.36%
BSJT
Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.75%6.77%6.65%6.42%5.45%1.20%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSJT and AVDV have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVDV has higher volatility (4.79%) compared to BSJT (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSJT dropped -19.62% vs AVDV's -43.01%.

On 3-year performance, AVDV leads with 28.61% vs 8.62% for BSJT. On fees, AVDV is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, BSJT has been the lower-risk option at 0.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, AVDV has performed better with a 28.61% return vs 8.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVDV is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJT.

BSJT has the higher dividend yield at 6.75%, compared with 2.73% for AVDV.

BSJT is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while AVDV is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJT and 0.36% for AVDV.

AVDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSJT and AVDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer