PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSJS vs. IBHE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSJS vs. IBHE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS) and iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF (IBHE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BSJS

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.61%
YTD
1.67%
6M
2.13%
1Y
6.48%
3Y*
8.32%
5Y*
3.29%
10Y*

IBHE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.09%
1Y
2.31%
3Y*
6.07%
5Y*
3.89%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSJS vs. IBHE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BSJS
Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.67%8.31%7.38%12.28%-13.69%3.40%4.05%
IBHE
iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF
0.00%4.45%7.62%10.32%-4.08%4.40%4.85%

Correlation

The correlation between BSJS and IBHE is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2020

0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between BSJS and IBHE has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

BSJS vs. IBHE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BSJS
IBHE

Healthcare

10.5%

-

Industrials

9.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%

-

Communication Services

5.5%

-

Energy

5.4%

-

Financial Services

4.6%

-

Technology

4.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.9%

-

Real Estate

2.9%
100.0%

Basic Materials

2.6%

-

Utilities

1.2%

-

Healthcare

BSJS
10.5%
IBHE

-

Industrials

BSJS
9.1%
IBHE

-

Consumer Cyclical

BSJS
7.5%
IBHE

-

Communication Services

BSJS
5.5%
IBHE

-

Energy

BSJS
5.4%
IBHE

-

Financial Services

BSJS
4.6%
IBHE

-

Technology

BSJS
4.5%
IBHE

-

Consumer Defensive

BSJS
3.9%
IBHE

-

Real Estate

BSJS
2.9%
IBHE
100.0%

Basic Materials

BSJS
2.6%
IBHE

-

Utilities

BSJS
1.2%
IBHE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSJS vs. IBHE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSJS
BSJS Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
BSJS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSJS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSJS Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
BSJS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSJS Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

IBHE
IBHE Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
IBHE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBHE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBHE Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IBHE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBHE Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSJS vs. IBHE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS) and iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF (IBHE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSJSIBHEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

2.19

-0.74

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.97

12.78

-8.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.33

63.40

-44.07

BSJS vs. IBHE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSJS Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is lower than the IBHE Sharpe Ratio of 3.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSJS and IBHE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSJSIBHEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29

3.51

-1.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.83

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.41

+0.12

Drawdowns

BSJS vs. IBHE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSJS drawdown since its inception was -17.73%, smaller than the maximum IBHE drawdown of -26.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJS and IBHE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSJSIBHEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.73%

-26.91%

+9.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.64%

-0.22%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.44%

-0.94%

-3.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.73%

-8.51%

-9.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

0.00%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.99%

-1.42%

-2.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.34%

0.05%

+0.29%

Volatility

BSJS vs. IBHE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS) has a higher volatility of 0.72% compared to iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF (IBHE) at 0.00%. This indicates that BSJS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBHE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSJSIBHEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.72%

0.00%

+0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.03%

0.39%

+1.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.84%

0.78%

+2.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.39%

4.87%

+2.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.14%

11.53%

-4.39%

BSJS vs. IBHE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSJS has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than IBHE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSJS vs. IBHE - Dividend Comparison

BSJS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.27%, more than IBHE's 2.29% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BSJS
Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.27%6.49%7.04%6.75%5.82%4.86%0.75%0.00%
IBHE
iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF
2.29%4.53%6.92%7.17%5.77%4.84%5.74%3.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSJS and IBHE have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BSJS has higher volatility (0.72%) compared to IBHE (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSJS dropped -17.73% vs IBHE's -26.91%.

On 5-year performance, IBHE leads with 3.89% vs 3.29% for BSJS. On fees, IBHE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IBHE has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IBHE has performed better with a 3.89% return vs 3.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBHE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJS.

BSJS has the higher dividend yield at 6.27%, compared with 2.29% for IBHE.

BSJS tracks Nasdaq BulletSharesUSD High Yield Corporate Bond 2028 Index, while IBHE tracks Bloomberg 2025 Term High Yield and Income Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJS and 0.35% for IBHE.

IBHE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.51 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSJS and IBHE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer