BSJS vs. IBHE
BSJS (Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and IBHE (iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - BSJS tracks the Nasdaq BulletSharesUSD High Yield Corporate Bond 2028 Index while IBHE tracks the Bloomberg 2025 Term High Yield and Income Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BSJS returned 3.29%/yr vs 3.89%/yr for IBHE. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BSJS charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for IBHE.
Performance
BSJS vs. IBHE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BSJS
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- YTD
- 1.67%
- 6M
- 2.13%
- 1Y
- 6.48%
- 3Y*
- 8.32%
- 5Y*
- 3.29%
- 10Y*
- —
IBHE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.09%
- 1Y
- 2.31%
- 3Y*
- 6.07%
- 5Y*
- 3.89%
- 10Y*
- —
BSJS vs. IBHE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJS Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.67% | 8.31% | 7.38% | 12.28% | -13.69% | 3.40% | 4.05% |
IBHE iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF | 0.00% | 4.45% | 7.62% | 10.32% | -4.08% | 4.40% | 4.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSJS and IBHE is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2020 | 0.65 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BSJS and IBHE has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
BSJS vs. IBHE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BSJS
IBHE
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Technology
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
BSJS
IBHE
-
Industrials
BSJS
IBHE
-
Consumer Cyclical
BSJS
IBHE
-
Communication Services
BSJS
IBHE
-
Energy
BSJS
IBHE
-
Financial Services
BSJS
IBHE
-
Technology
BSJS
IBHE
-
Consumer Defensive
BSJS
IBHE
-
Real Estate
BSJS
IBHE
Basic Materials
BSJS
IBHE
-
Utilities
BSJS
IBHE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSJS vs. IBHE — Risk / Return Rank
BSJS
IBHE
BSJS vs. IBHE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS) and iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF (IBHE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSJS | IBHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 2.19 | -0.74 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.97 | 12.78 | -8.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.33 | 63.40 | -44.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSJS | IBHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.29 | 3.51 | -1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.83 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.41 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
BSJS vs. IBHE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSJS drawdown since its inception was -17.73%, smaller than the maximum IBHE drawdown of -26.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJS and IBHE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSJS | IBHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.73% | -26.91% | +9.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.64% | -0.22% | -1.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.44% | -0.94% | -3.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.73% | -8.51% | -9.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | 0.00% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.99% | -1.42% | -2.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.34% | 0.05% | +0.29% |
Volatility
BSJS vs. IBHE - Volatility Comparison
Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS) has a higher volatility of 0.72% compared to iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF (IBHE) at 0.00%. This indicates that BSJS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBHE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSJS | IBHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.72% | 0.00% | +0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.03% | 0.39% | +1.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.84% | 0.78% | +2.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.39% | 4.87% | +2.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.14% | 11.53% | -4.39% |
BSJS vs. IBHE - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSJS has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than IBHE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSJS vs. IBHE - Dividend Comparison
BSJS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.27%, more than IBHE's 2.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJS Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.27% | 6.49% | 7.04% | 6.75% | 5.82% | 4.86% | 0.75% | 0.00% |
IBHE iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF | 2.29% | 4.53% | 6.92% | 7.17% | 5.77% | 4.84% | 5.74% | 3.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSJS and IBHE have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BSJS has higher volatility (0.72%) compared to IBHE (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSJS dropped -17.73% vs IBHE's -26.91%.
On 5-year performance, IBHE leads with 3.89% vs 3.29% for BSJS. On fees, IBHE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IBHE has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IBHE has performed better with a 3.89% return vs 3.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBHE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJS.
BSJS has the higher dividend yield at 6.27%, compared with 2.29% for IBHE.
BSJS tracks Nasdaq BulletSharesUSD High Yield Corporate Bond 2028 Index, while IBHE tracks Bloomberg 2025 Term High Yield and Income Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJS and 0.35% for IBHE.
IBHE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.51 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSJS and IBHE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer