PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSJS vs. ESHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSJS vs. ESHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS) and Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (ESHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BSJS

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.61%
YTD
1.67%
6M
2.13%
1Y
6.48%
3Y*
8.32%
5Y*
3.29%
10Y*

ESHY

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSJS vs. ESHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


BSJS vs. ESHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BSJS
ESHY

Healthcare

10.5%

-

Industrials

9.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%

-

Communication Services

5.5%

-

Energy

5.4%
100.0%

Financial Services

4.6%

-

Technology

4.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.9%

-

Real Estate

2.9%

-

Basic Materials

2.6%

-

Utilities

1.2%

-

Healthcare

BSJS
10.5%
ESHY

-

Industrials

BSJS
9.1%
ESHY

-

Consumer Cyclical

BSJS
7.5%
ESHY

-

Communication Services

BSJS
5.5%
ESHY

-

Energy

BSJS
5.4%
ESHY
100.0%

Financial Services

BSJS
4.6%
ESHY

-

Technology

BSJS
4.5%
ESHY

-

Consumer Defensive

BSJS
3.9%
ESHY

-

Real Estate

BSJS
2.9%
ESHY

-

Basic Materials

BSJS
2.6%
ESHY

-

Utilities

BSJS
1.2%
ESHY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSJS vs. ESHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSJS
BSJS Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
BSJS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSJS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSJS Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
BSJS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSJS Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

ESHY
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSJS vs. ESHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS) and Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (ESHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSJSESHYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.33

BSJS vs. ESHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSJSESHYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

Drawdowns

BSJS vs. ESHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSJS drawdown since its inception was -17.73%, which is greater than ESHY's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJS and ESHY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSJSESHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.73%

0.00%

-17.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

0.00%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.99%

0.00%

-3.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.34%

Volatility

BSJS vs. ESHY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSJSESHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.84%

0.00%

+2.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.39%

0.00%

+7.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.14%

0.00%

+7.14%

BSJS vs. ESHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSJS has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than ESHY's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSJS vs. ESHY - Dividend Comparison

BSJS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.27%, while ESHY has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BSJS
Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.27%6.49%7.04%6.75%5.82%4.86%0.75%
ESHY
Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, ESHY is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESHY is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJS.

BSJS has the higher dividend yield at 6.27%, compared with 0.00% for ESHY.

BSJS tracks Nasdaq BulletSharesUSD High Yield Corporate Bond 2028 Index, while ESHY tracks JPMorgan ESG DM Corporate High Yield USD Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJS and 0.20% for ESHY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSJS and ESHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer