PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSJS vs. BBHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSJS vs. BBHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSJS achieves a 1.67% return, which is significantly higher than BBHY's 1.58% return.


BSJS

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.61%
YTD
1.67%
6M
2.13%
1Y
6.48%
3Y*
8.32%
5Y*
3.29%
10Y*

BBHY

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.42%
YTD
1.58%
6M
1.96%
1Y
7.15%
3Y*
8.61%
5Y*
4.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSJS vs. BBHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BSJS
Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.67%8.31%7.38%12.28%-13.69%3.40%4.05%
BBHY
JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.58%8.51%7.81%11.98%-10.37%3.88%4.55%

Correlation

The correlation between BSJS and BBHY is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2020

0.86

The correlation between BSJS and BBHY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

BSJS vs. BBHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BSJS
BBHY

Healthcare

10.5%
5.4%

Industrials

9.1%
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%
10.0%

Communication Services

5.5%
7.9%

Energy

5.4%
5.2%

Financial Services

4.6%
4.1%

Technology

4.5%
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
2.5%

Real Estate

2.9%
3.9%

Basic Materials

2.6%
3.2%

Utilities

1.2%
2.0%

Healthcare

BSJS
10.5%
BBHY
5.4%

Industrials

BSJS
9.1%
BBHY
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

BSJS
7.5%
BBHY
10.0%

Communication Services

BSJS
5.5%
BBHY
7.9%

Energy

BSJS
5.4%
BBHY
5.2%

Financial Services

BSJS
4.6%
BBHY
4.1%

Technology

BSJS
4.5%
BBHY
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

BSJS
3.9%
BBHY
2.5%

Real Estate

BSJS
2.9%
BBHY
3.9%

Basic Materials

BSJS
2.6%
BBHY
3.2%

Utilities

BSJS
1.2%
BBHY
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSJS vs. BBHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSJS
BSJS Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
BSJS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSJS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSJS Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
BSJS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSJS Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

BBHY
BBHY Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
BBHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBHY Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
BBHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBHY Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSJS vs. BBHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSJSBBHYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.39

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.97

3.02

+0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.33

13.58

+5.75

BSJS vs. BBHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSJS Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the BBHY Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSJS and BBHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSJSBBHYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29

1.98

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.57

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.64

-0.12

Drawdowns

BSJS vs. BBHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSJS drawdown since its inception was -17.73%, smaller than the maximum BBHY drawdown of -24.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJS and BBHY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSJSBBHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.73%

-24.98%

+7.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.64%

-2.37%

+0.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.44%

-5.00%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.73%

-15.32%

-2.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

-0.30%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.99%

-2.37%

-1.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.34%

0.53%

-0.19%

Volatility

BSJS vs. BBHY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS) is 0.72%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY) has a volatility of 1.12%. This indicates that BSJS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSJSBBHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.72%

1.12%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.03%

2.86%

-0.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.84%

3.62%

-0.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.39%

7.26%

+0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.14%

7.53%

-0.39%

BSJS vs. BBHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSJS has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than BBHY's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSJS vs. BBHY - Dividend Comparison

BSJS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.27%, less than BBHY's 6.95% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BBHY
JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.95%7.24%7.18%6.49%5.92%4.06%4.73%4.99%5.02%4.81%1.42%
BSJS
Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.27%6.49%7.04%6.75%5.82%4.86%0.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSJS and BBHY have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBHY has higher volatility (1.12%) compared to BSJS (0.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSJS dropped -17.73% vs BBHY's -24.98%.

On 5-year performance, BBHY leads with 4.09% vs 3.29% for BSJS. On fees, BBHY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BSJS has been the lower-risk option at 0.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBHY has performed better with a 4.09% return vs 3.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBHY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJS.

BBHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.95%, compared with 6.27% for BSJS.

BSJS tracks Nasdaq BulletSharesUSD High Yield Corporate Bond 2028 Index, while BBHY tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJS and 0.15% for BBHY.

BSJS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSJS and BBHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer