BSJR vs. NJNK
BSJR (Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and NJNK (Columbia U.S. High Yield ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. BSJR is passively managed, while NJNK is actively managed. Over the past year, BSJR returned 4.78% vs 6.85% for NJNK. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BSJR charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for NJNK.
Performance
BSJR vs. NJNK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSJR achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly lower than NJNK's 1.50% return.
BSJR
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 1.27%
- 6M
- 1.81%
- 1Y
- 4.78%
- 3Y*
- 7.93%
- 5Y*
- 3.40%
- 10Y*
- —
NJNK
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- 1.50%
- 6M
- 2.00%
- 1Y
- 6.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSJR vs. NJNK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BSJR Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.27% | 7.41% | 1.51% |
NJNK Columbia U.S. High Yield ETF | 1.50% | 9.03% | 0.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSJR and NJNK is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2024 | 0.81 |
The correlation between BSJR and NJNK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSJR vs. NJNK — Risk / Return Rank
BSJR
NJNK
BSJR vs. NJNK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJR) and Columbia U.S. High Yield ETF (NJNK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSJR | NJNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.33 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.13 | 2.61 | +1.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.06 | 10.86 | +8.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSJR | NJNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | 1.72 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 1.33 | -0.90 |
Drawdowns
BSJR vs. NJNK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSJR drawdown since its inception was -22.58%, which is greater than NJNK's maximum drawdown of -4.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJR and NJNK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSJR | NJNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.58% | -4.48% | -18.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.16% | -2.63% | +1.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.15% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -0.14% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.25% | -0.49% | -2.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.25% | 0.63% | -0.38% |
Volatility
BSJR vs. NJNK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJR) is 0.59%, while Columbia U.S. High Yield ETF (NJNK) has a volatility of 1.41%. This indicates that BSJR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NJNK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSJR | NJNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.59% | 1.41% | -0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.45% | 3.11% | -1.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12% | 4.00% | -1.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.73% | 4.80% | +1.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.36% | 4.80% | +4.56% |
BSJR vs. NJNK - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSJR has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than NJNK's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSJR vs. NJNK - Dividend Comparison
BSJR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.74%, less than NJNK's 6.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJR Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 5.74% | 6.19% | 6.75% | 6.48% | 5.37% | 4.49% | 4.53% | 1.20% |
NJNK Columbia U.S. High Yield ETF | 6.42% | 6.34% | 2.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSJR and NJNK have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NJNK has higher volatility (1.41%) compared to BSJR (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSJR dropped -22.58% vs NJNK's -4.48%.
On 1-year performance, NJNK leads with 6.85% vs 4.78% for BSJR. On fees, BSJR is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, BSJR has been the lower-risk option at 0.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NJNK has performed better with a 6.85% return vs 4.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSJR is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for NJNK.
NJNK has the higher dividend yield at 6.42%, compared with 5.74% for BSJR.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Columbia. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJR and 0.46% for NJNK.
BSJR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSJR and NJNK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer