BSJR vs. NHYB
BSJR (Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and NHYB (Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - BSJR tracks the NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2027 Index while NHYB tracks the ICE BofA BB-B US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BSJR charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for NHYB.
Performance
BSJR vs. NHYB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSJR achieves a 1.63% return, which is significantly lower than NHYB's 1.93% return.
BSJR
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 1.41%
- YTD
- 1.63%
- 1Y
- 4.43%
- 3Y*
- 7.53%
- 5Y*
- 3.28%
- 10Y*
- —
NHYB
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.01%
- 6M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 1.93%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSJR vs. NHYB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BSJR Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.63% | 0.96% |
NHYB Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.93% | 1.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSJR and NHYB is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSJR vs. NHYB — Risk / Return Rank
BSJR
NHYB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BSJR vs. NHYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJR) and Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (NHYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BSJR | NHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.82 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.56 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BSJR vs. NHYB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSJR drawdown since its inception was -22.58%, which is greater than NHYB's maximum drawdown of -2.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJR and NHYB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSJR | NHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.58% | -2.40% | -20.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.15% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.08% | -0.47% | +0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.20% | -0.34% | -2.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.24% | — | — |
Volatility
BSJR vs. NHYB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSJR | NHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.52% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.52% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96% | 3.55% | -1.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.73% | 3.55% | +3.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.30% | 3.55% | +5.75% |
BSJR vs. NHYB - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSJR has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than NHYB's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSJR vs. NHYB - Dividend Comparison
BSJR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.66%, more than NHYB's 4.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJR Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 5.66% | 6.19% | 6.75% | 6.48% | 5.37% | 4.49% | 4.53% | 1.20% |
NHYB Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 4.83% | 1.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSJR and NHYB have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NHYB is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NHYB is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJR.
BSJR has the higher dividend yield at 5.66%, compared with 4.83% for NHYB.
BSJR tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2027 Index, while NHYB tracks ICE BofA BB-B US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Nuveen. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJR and 0.08% for NHYB.
Find the right allocation for BSJR and NHYB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer