BSJR vs. DADS
BSJR (Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and DADS (Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. BSJR is passively managed, while DADS is actively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BSJR charges 0.42%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for DADS.
Performance
BSJR vs. DADS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSJR achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly lower than DADS's 14.38% return.
BSJR
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 1.27%
- 6M
- 1.81%
- 1Y
- 4.78%
- 3Y*
- 7.93%
- 5Y*
- 3.40%
- 10Y*
- —
DADS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.96%
- YTD
- 14.38%
- 6M
- 9.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSJR vs. DADS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BSJR Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.27% | 2.05% |
DADS Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF | 14.38% | -3.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSJR and DADS is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2025 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSJR vs. DADS — Risk / Return Rank
BSJR
DADS
BSJR vs. DADS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJR) and Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF (DADS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSJR | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.13 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.06 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSJR | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.73 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
BSJR vs. DADS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSJR drawdown since its inception was -22.58%, which is greater than DADS's maximum drawdown of -17.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJR and DADS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSJR | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.58% | -17.07% | -5.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.15% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -2.77% | +2.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.25% | -7.61% | +4.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.25% | — | — |
Volatility
BSJR vs. DADS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSJR | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.59% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.45% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12% | 17.54% | -15.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.73% | 17.54% | -10.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.36% | 17.54% | -8.18% |
BSJR vs. DADS - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSJR has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than DADS's 1.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSJR vs. DADS - Dividend Comparison
BSJR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.74%, more than DADS's 2.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJR Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 5.74% | 6.19% | 6.75% | 6.48% | 5.37% | 4.49% | 4.53% | 1.20% |
DADS Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF | 2.76% | 1.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSJR and DADS have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BSJR is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSJR is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for DADS.
BSJR has the higher dividend yield at 5.74%, compared with 2.76% for DADS.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Alphabit. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJR and 1.04% for DADS.
Find the right allocation for BSJR and DADS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer