PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSJP vs. USD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSJP vs. USD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJP) and ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BSJP

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

USD

1D
1.64%
1M
16.06%
YTD
110.66%
6M
113.42%
1Y
253.70%
3Y*
123.90%
5Y*
68.54%
10Y*
63.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSJP vs. USD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BSJP
Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
0.00%4.46%8.07%10.41%-5.16%4.57%4.16%16.89%-4.66%0.43%
USD
ProShares Ultra Semiconductors
110.66%62.08%139.64%228.79%-68.57%104.27%68.16%110.37%-26.88%30.40%

Correlation

The correlation between BSJP and USD is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2017

0.48

The correlation between BSJP and USD shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.48 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSJP vs. USD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSJP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


USD
USD Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
USD Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
USD Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSJP vs. USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJP) and ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BSJPUSDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.36

BSJP vs. USD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BSJP vs. USD - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSJPUSDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.40%

Volatility

BSJP vs. USD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSJPUSDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

31.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

77.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.80%

BSJP vs. USD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSJP has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than USD's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSJP vs. USD - Dividend Comparison

BSJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, more than USD's 0.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSJP
Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
2.26%4.50%6.25%7.07%5.37%4.27%4.96%5.49%5.84%1.32%0.00%0.00%
USD
ProShares Ultra Semiconductors
0.22%0.39%0.10%0.05%0.30%0.00%0.14%0.72%0.93%0.32%0.46%0.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSJP and USD have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BSJP is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BSJP is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for USD.

BSJP has the higher dividend yield at 2.26%, compared with 0.22% for USD.

BSJP is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while USD is Leveraged Equities. BSJP tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2025 TR Index, while USD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJP and 0.95% for USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSJP and USD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer