BSJP vs. MFUT

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

BSJP (Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and MFUT (Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSJP is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2025 TR Index, while MFUT is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by Cambria. BSJP is passively managed, while MFUT is actively managed. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BSJP charges 0.42%/yr vs 1.18%/yr for MFUT.

Performance

BSJP vs. MFUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJP) and Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF (MFUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BSJP

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MFUT

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: -1.93%
• 6M: 6.74%
• YTD: 15.13%
• 1Y: 26.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSJP vs. MFUT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BSJP Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	0.00%	4.46%	4.33%
MFUT Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF	15.13%	-1.83%	-16.64%

Correlation

The correlation between BSJP and MFUT is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2024	0.10

The correlation between BSJP and MFUT shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BSJP vs. MFUT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSJP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MFUT

MFUT Risk / Return Rank: 64
MFUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
MFUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
MFUT Omega Ratio Rank: 72
MFUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
MFUT Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSJP vs. MFUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJP) and Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF (MFUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BSJP	MFUT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.74	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.20	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.34	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.72	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.49	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	BSJP	MFUT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-29.28%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-6.45%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-16.01%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.58%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BSJP	MFUT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.40%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.24%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	15.53%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	13.65%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	13.65%	—

BSJP vs. MFUT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSJP has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than MFUT's 1.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

BSJP vs. MFUT - Dividend Comparison

BSJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, while MFUT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BSJP Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	1.89%	4.50%	6.25%	7.07%	5.37%	4.27%	4.96%	5.49%	5.84%	1.32%
MFUT Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.33%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BSJP and MFUT in my portfolio?

BSJP and MFUT have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BSJP or MFUT?

On fees, BSJP is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BSJP or MFUT?

BSJP is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 1.18% for MFUT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BSJP or MFUT?

BSJP has the higher dividend yield at 1.89%, compared with 0.00% for MFUT.

What is the main difference between BSJP and MFUT?

BSJP is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while MFUT is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJP and 1.18% for MFUT.