BSJP vs. IXN
BSJP (Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and IXN (iShares Global Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSJP is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2025 TR Index, while IXN is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Information Technology Sector Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BSJP charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for IXN.
Performance
BSJP vs. IXN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BSJP
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IXN
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 8.90%
- YTD
- 40.36%
- 6M
- 40.73%
- 1Y
- 70.75%
- 3Y*
- 35.39%
- 5Y*
- 22.48%
- 10Y*
- 25.98%
BSJP vs. IXN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJP Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 0.00% | 4.46% | 8.07% | 10.41% | -5.16% | 4.57% | 4.16% | 16.89% | -4.66% | 0.43% |
IXN iShares Global Tech ETF | 40.36% | 25.25% | 24.84% | 52.98% | -29.86% | 29.58% | 43.62% | 47.88% | -5.44% | 10.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSJP and IXN is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2017 | 0.56 |
The correlation between BSJP and IXN shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSJP vs. IXN — Risk / Return Rank
BSJP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IXN
BSJP vs. IXN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJP) and iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BSJP | IXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.47 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.16 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 16.70 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BSJP vs. IXN - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSJP | IXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -55.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -1.58% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -11.26% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.25% | — |
Volatility
BSJP vs. IXN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSJP | IXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.73% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.80% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 24.64% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 25.33% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 24.66% | — |
BSJP vs. IXN - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSJP has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than IXN's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSJP vs. IXN - Dividend Comparison
BSJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, more than IXN's 0.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJP Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 2.26% | 4.50% | 6.25% | 7.07% | 5.37% | 4.27% | 4.96% | 5.49% | 5.84% | 1.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IXN iShares Global Tech ETF | 0.74% | 1.04% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.81% | 0.58% | 0.63% | 1.06% | 0.94% | 0.93% | 1.03% | 1.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSJP and IXN have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BSJP is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSJP is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for IXN.
BSJP has the higher dividend yield at 2.26%, compared with 0.74% for IXN.
BSJP is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while IXN is Technology Equities. BSJP tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2025 TR Index, while IXN tracks S&P Global Information Technology Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJP and 0.46% for IXN.
Find the right allocation for BSJP and IXN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer