BSJP vs. IDMO
BSJP (Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and IDMO (Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSJP is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2025 TR Index, while IDMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BSJP charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IDMO.
Performance
BSJP vs. IDMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BSJP
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IDMO
- 1D
- -1.59%
- 1M
- -2.15%
- 6M
- 5.42%
- YTD
- 8.27%
- 1Y
- 21.68%
- 3Y*
- 24.84%
- 5Y*
- 15.50%
- 10Y*
- 12.47%
BSJP vs. IDMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJP Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 0.00% | 4.46% | 8.07% | 10.41% | -5.16% | 4.57% | 4.16% | 16.89% | -4.66% | 0.43% |
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF | 8.27% | 42.17% | 12.79% | 20.16% | -12.03% | 14.31% | 22.01% | 26.09% | -16.66% | 5.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSJP and IDMO is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2017 | 0.47 |
The correlation between BSJP and IDMO shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.47 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSJP vs. IDMO — Risk / Return Rank
BSJP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IDMO
BSJP vs. IDMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJP) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BSJP | IDMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.22 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.77 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.94 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BSJP vs. IDMO - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSJP | IDMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -39.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -3.93% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -9.70% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.13% | — |
Volatility
BSJP vs. IDMO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSJP | IDMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.93% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.86% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 18.53% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 18.14% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 17.89% | — |
BSJP vs. IDMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSJP has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than IDMO's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSJP vs. IDMO - Dividend Comparison
BSJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, less than IDMO's 3.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJP Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.89% | 4.50% | 6.25% | 7.07% | 5.37% | 4.27% | 4.96% | 5.49% | 5.84% | 1.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF | 3.69% | 3.71% | 2.24% | 2.89% | 3.66% | 1.81% | 1.63% | 2.78% | 3.27% | 3.08% | 2.18% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSJP and IDMO have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IDMO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IDMO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJP.
IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 3.69%, compared with 1.89% for BSJP.
BSJP is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while IDMO is Momentum. BSJP tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2025 TR Index, while IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJP and 0.25% for IDMO.
Find the right allocation for BSJP and IDMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer