PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSJP vs. HYEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSJP vs. HYEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJP) and VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BSJP

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HYEM

1D
-0.10%
1M
1.26%
YTD
3.92%
6M
4.87%
1Y
10.30%
3Y*
11.00%
5Y*
3.04%
10Y*
4.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSJP vs. HYEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BSJP
Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
0.00%4.46%8.07%10.41%-5.16%4.57%4.16%16.89%-4.66%0.35%
HYEM
VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF
3.92%9.24%12.14%8.35%-13.39%-1.31%6.87%12.85%-3.38%0.80%

Correlation

The correlation between BSJP and HYEM is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2017

0.44

The correlation between BSJP and HYEM shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.49 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BSJP vs. HYEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BSJP
HYEM

Financial Services

95.2%

-

Industrials

4.7%
100.0%

Energy

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

BSJP
95.2%
HYEM

-

Industrials

BSJP
4.7%
HYEM
100.0%

Energy

BSJP
0.1%
HYEM

-

Basic Materials

BSJP

-

HYEM

-

Communication Services

BSJP

-

HYEM

-

Consumer Cyclical

BSJP

-

HYEM

-

Consumer Defensive

BSJP

-

HYEM

-

Healthcare

BSJP

-

HYEM

-

Real Estate

BSJP

-

HYEM

-

Technology

BSJP

-

HYEM

-

Utilities

BSJP

-

HYEM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSJP vs. HYEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSJP

HYEM
HYEM Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
HYEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
HYEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSJP vs. HYEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJP) and VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BSJP vs. HYEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSJPHYEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

Drawdowns

BSJP vs. HYEM - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSJPHYEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.67%

Volatility

BSJP vs. HYEM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSJPHYEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.27%

BSJP vs. HYEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSJP has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than HYEM's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSJP vs. HYEM - Dividend Comparison

BSJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, less than HYEM's 6.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSJP
Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
2.26%4.50%6.25%7.07%5.37%4.27%4.96%5.49%5.84%1.32%0.00%0.00%
HYEM
VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF
6.52%6.67%6.34%6.27%6.47%5.33%5.56%6.14%5.71%5.86%6.25%7.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSJP and HYEM have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HYEM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HYEM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJP.

HYEM has the higher dividend yield at 6.52%, compared with 2.26% for BSJP.

BSJP tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2025 TR Index, while HYEM tracks BofA Merrill Lynch Diversified High Yield US Emerging Markets Corporate Plus Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJP and 0.40% for HYEM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSJP and HYEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer