BSJP vs. BSJR
BSJP (Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and BSJR (Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds from Invesco - BSJP tracks the NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2025 TR Index while BSJR tracks the NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2027 Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.42% expense ratio.
Performance
BSJP vs. BSJR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BSJP
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSJR
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 6M
- 1.70%
- 1Y
- 4.78%
- 3Y*
- 7.78%
- 5Y*
- 3.37%
- 10Y*
- —
BSJP vs. BSJR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJP Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 0.00% | 4.46% | 8.07% | 10.41% | -5.16% | 4.57% | 4.16% | 2.67% |
BSJR Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.11% | 7.41% | 7.15% | 11.91% | -11.35% | 3.60% | 5.69% | 3.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSJP and BSJR is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2019 | 0.82 |
The correlation between BSJP and BSJR shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
BSJP vs. BSJR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BSJP
BSJR
Financial Services
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
BSJP
BSJR
Industrials
BSJP
BSJR
Energy
BSJP
BSJR
Basic Materials
BSJP
-
BSJR
Communication Services
BSJP
-
BSJR
Consumer Cyclical
BSJP
-
BSJR
Consumer Defensive
BSJP
-
BSJR
Healthcare
BSJP
-
BSJR
Real Estate
BSJP
-
BSJR
Technology
BSJP
-
BSJR
Utilities
BSJP
-
BSJR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSJP vs. BSJR — Risk / Return Rank
BSJP
BSJR
BSJP vs. BSJR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJP) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSJP | BSJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.43 | — |
Drawdowns
BSJP vs. BSJR - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSJP | BSJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -22.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.16% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -0.27% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -3.25% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.25% | — |
Volatility
BSJP vs. BSJR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSJP | BSJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.57% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.45% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.12% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 6.73% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 9.37% | — |
BSJP vs. BSJR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BSJP and BSJR have an expense ratio of 0.42%.
Dividends
BSJP vs. BSJR - Dividend Comparison
BSJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, less than BSJR's 5.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJP Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 2.26% | 4.50% | 6.25% | 7.07% | 5.37% | 4.27% | 4.96% | 5.49% | 5.84% | 1.32% |
BSJR Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 5.75% | 6.19% | 6.75% | 6.48% | 5.37% | 4.49% | 4.53% | 1.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSJP and BSJR have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.42% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSJP and BSJR have the same expense ratio: 0.42% per year.
BSJR has the higher dividend yield at 5.75%, compared with 2.26% for BSJP.
BSJP tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2025 TR Index, while BSJR tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2027 Index.
Find the right allocation for BSJP and BSJR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer