PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSJP vs. AUGZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSJP vs. AUGZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJP) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF (AUGZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BSJP

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AUGZ

1D
-0.55%
1M
-0.04%
6M
6.38%
YTD
7.59%
1Y
15.54%
3Y*
14.70%
5Y*
10.26%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSJP vs. AUGZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BSJP
Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
0.00%4.46%8.07%10.41%-5.16%4.57%5.32%
AUGZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF
7.59%13.49%17.99%17.32%-10.41%20.74%11.22%

Correlation

The correlation between BSJP and AUGZ is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2020

0.59

The correlation between BSJP and AUGZ shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSJP vs. AUGZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSJP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


AUGZ
AUGZ Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
AUGZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUGZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUGZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
AUGZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUGZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSJP vs. AUGZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJP) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF (AUGZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BSJPAUGZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.59

BSJP vs. AUGZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BSJP vs. AUGZ - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSJPAUGZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.81%

Volatility

BSJP vs. AUGZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSJPAUGZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.13%

BSJP vs. AUGZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSJP has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than AUGZ's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSJP vs. AUGZ - Dividend Comparison

BSJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, less than AUGZ's 3.37% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AUGZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF
3.37%3.63%4.08%3.42%0.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BSJP
Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.89%4.50%6.25%7.07%5.37%4.27%4.96%5.49%5.84%1.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSJP and AUGZ have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BSJP is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BSJP is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for AUGZ.

AUGZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.37%, compared with 1.89% for BSJP.

BSJP is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while AUGZ is Defined Outcome. BSJP tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2025 TR Index, while AUGZ tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and TrueShares. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJP and 0.79% for AUGZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSJP and AUGZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer