BSJO vs. FLRT

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

BSJO (Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and FLRT (Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. BSJO is passively managed, while FLRT is actively managed. BSJO charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for FLRT.

Performance

BSJO vs. FLRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJO) and Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BSJO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLRT

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.24%
• YTD: 1.88%
• 6M: 1.93%
• 1Y: 5.70%
• 3Y*: 8.56%
• 5Y*: 5.97%
• 10Y*: 4.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSJO vs. FLRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BSJO Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	0.00%
FLRT Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF	1.67%

Return for Risk

BSJO vs. FLRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSJO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FLRT

FLRT Risk / Return Rank: 84
FLRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FLRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
FLRT Omega Ratio Rank: 97
FLRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FLRT Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSJO vs. FLRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJO) and Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BSJO	FLRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	3.59	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	5.55	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.85	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.22	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	11.76	—

Drawdowns

BSJO vs. FLRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSJO drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum FLRT drawdown of -20.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJO and FLRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSJO	FLRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-20.96%	+20.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-1.78%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-2.87%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-7.60%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-20.96%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.11%	+0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-1.41%	+1.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.49%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BSJO	FLRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.43%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.22%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	1.60%	-1.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	2.30%	-2.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	6.12%	-6.12%

BSJO vs. FLRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSJO has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than FLRT's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

BSJO vs. FLRT - Dividend Comparison

BSJO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.80%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BSJO Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FLRT Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF	6.80%	6.93%	7.93%	8.40%	5.81%	3.16%	3.52%	4.30%	3.95%	3.20%	3.38%	3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, BSJO or FLRT?

On fees, BSJO is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BSJO or FLRT?

BSJO is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for FLRT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BSJO or FLRT?

FLRT has the higher dividend yield at 6.80%, compared with 0.00% for BSJO.

What is the main difference between BSJO and FLRT?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Pacific Life. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJO and 0.69% for FLRT.