BSJO vs. ACVF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BSJO (Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and ACVF (American Conservative Values ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSJO is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2024 TR Index, while ACVF is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Ridgeline Research LLC. BSJO is passively managed, while ACVF is actively managed. BSJO charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ACVF.

Performance

BSJO vs. ACVF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJO) and American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BSJO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ACVF

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: 6.32%
• YTD: 10.58%
• 6M: 11.23%
• 1Y: 20.30%
• 3Y*: 19.62%
• 5Y*: 12.39%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSJO vs. ACVF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BSJO Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	0.00%
ACVF American Conservative Values ETF	9.11%

Return for Risk

BSJO vs. ACVF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACVF

ACVF Risk / Return Rank: 54
ACVF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
ACVF Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
ACVF Omega Ratio Rank: 50
ACVF Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
ACVF Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSJO vs. ACVF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJO) and American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BSJO	ACVF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.79	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.77	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	1.02	—

Drawdowns

BSJO vs. ACVF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSJO drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum ACVF drawdown of -24.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJO and ACVF.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSJO	ACVF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-24.39%	+24.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.70%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.82%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.39%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.53%	+0.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-4.75%	+4.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.89%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BSJO	ACVF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.06%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.00%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	11.41%	-11.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	16.23%	-16.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	15.97%	-15.97%

BSJO vs. ACVF - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSJO has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than ACVF's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BSJO vs. ACVF - Dividend Comparison

BSJO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACVF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ACVF American Conservative Values ETF	0.53%	0.59%	0.59%	0.82%	0.93%	0.61%	0.23%
BSJO Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, BSJO or ACVF?

On fees, BSJO is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BSJO or ACVF?

BSJO is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ACVF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BSJO or ACVF?

ACVF has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.00% for BSJO.

What is the main difference between BSJO and ACVF?

BSJO is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while ACVF is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Ridgeline Research LLC. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJO and 0.75% for ACVF.