BSJO vs. ACVF
BSJO (Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and ACVF (American Conservative Values ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSJO is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2024 TR Index, while ACVF is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Ridgeline Research LLC. BSJO is passively managed, while ACVF is actively managed. BSJO charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ACVF.
Performance
BSJO vs. ACVF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BSJO
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACVF
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 1.19%
- 6M
- 8.49%
- YTD
- 10.51%
- 1Y
- 15.39%
- 3Y*
- 17.90%
- 5Y*
- 11.85%
- 10Y*
- —
BSJO vs. ACVF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BSJO Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 0.00% |
ACVF American Conservative Values ETF | 11.94% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSJO vs. ACVF — Risk / Return Rank
BSJO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ACVF
BSJO vs. ACVF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJO) and American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BSJO | ACVF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.22 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.93 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.45 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BSJO vs. ACVF - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSJO | ACVF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -24.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -0.60% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -4.69% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.99% | — |
Volatility
BSJO vs. ACVF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSJO | ACVF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.30% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.98% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 12.12% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 16.35% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 15.97% | — |
BSJO vs. ACVF - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSJO has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than ACVF's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSJO vs. ACVF - Dividend Comparison
BSJO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACVF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACVF American Conservative Values ETF | 0.52% | 0.59% | 0.59% | 0.82% | 0.93% | 0.61% | 0.23% |
BSJO Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, BSJO is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSJO is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ACVF.
ACVF has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.00% for BSJO.
BSJO is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while ACVF is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Ridgeline Research LLC. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJO and 0.75% for ACVF.
Find the right allocation for BSJO and ACVF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer