PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSIIX vs. BACAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSIIX vs. BACAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Strategic Income Opportunities Fund Class I (BSIIX) and BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund (BACAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSIIX achieves a 0.93% return, which is significantly lower than BACAX's 33.75% return. Over the past 10 years, BSIIX has underperformed BACAX with an annualized return of 3.60%, while BACAX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.18% annualized return.


BSIIX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-1.23%
6M
0.10%
YTD
0.93%
1Y
4.13%
3Y*
6.32%
5Y*
2.73%
10Y*
3.60%
ALL TIME*
3.90%

BACAX

1D
0.71%
1M
11.65%
6M
20.68%
YTD
33.75%
1Y
42.22%
3Y*
15.51%
5Y*
21.53%
10Y*
9.18%
ALL TIME*
5.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BSIIX vs. BACAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BSIIX
BlackRock Strategic Income Opportunities Fund Class I
0.93%8.59%5.22%6.18%-6.14%0.80%7.22%7.65%-0.42%4.89%
BACAX
BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund
33.75%10.53%3.78%2.61%43.02%42.93%-29.68%12.64%-19.98%2.07%

Correlation

The correlation between BSIIX and BACAX is -0.30, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2008

0.13

The correlation between BSIIX and BACAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.30 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSIIX vs. BACAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BSIIX
BSIIX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
BSIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
BSIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

BACAX
BACAX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
BACAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BACAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
BACAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
BACAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
BACAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BSIIX vs. BACAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Strategic Income Opportunities Fund Class I (BSIIX) and BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund (BACAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BSIIXBACAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.37

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

3.06

-1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.86

9.08

-3.22

BSIIX vs. BACAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSIIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is lower than the BACAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSIIX and BACAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BSIIX vs. BACAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSIIX drawdown since its inception was -18.76%, smaller than the maximum BACAX drawdown of -78.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSIIX and BACAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSIIXBACAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.76%

-78.88%

+60.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.84%

-13.36%

+10.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.84%

-18.73%

+15.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.13%

-25.74%

+16.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.91%

-65.92%

+56.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.35%

-2.33%

+0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.80%

-34.07%

+32.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

4.50%

-3.72%

Volatility

BSIIX vs. BACAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Strategic Income Opportunities Fund Class I (BSIIX) is 0.69%, while BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund (BACAX) has a volatility of 5.78%. This indicates that BSIIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BACAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSIIXBACAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.69%

5.78%

-5.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.44%

14.79%

-12.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.99%

17.98%

-14.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.03%

23.36%

-20.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.15%

27.14%

-23.99%

BSIIX vs. BACAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSIIX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than BACAX's 1.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSIIX vs. BACAX - Dividend Comparison

BSIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, more than BACAX's 1.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BACAX
BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund
1.76%2.47%2.29%3.06%2.21%2.39%3.38%2.69%2.87%2.48%1.95%1.98%
BSIIX
BlackRock Strategic Income Opportunities Fund Class I
4.83%5.07%4.75%3.33%3.58%2.98%2.92%3.54%3.32%3.45%2.91%3.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSIIX and BACAX have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BACAX has higher volatility (5.78%) compared to BSIIX (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSIIX dropped -18.76% vs BACAX's -78.88%.

BACAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSIIX and BACAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer