BSEP vs. PJUL
BSEP (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September) and PJUL (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator - BSEP tracks the S&P 500 Index while PJUL tracks the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index July. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BSEP returned 10.77%/yr vs 10.46%/yr for PJUL. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
BSEP vs. PJUL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSEP achieves a 6.80% return, which is significantly higher than PJUL's 4.63% return.
BSEP
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 2.14%
- YTD
- 6.80%
- 6M
- 7.19%
- 1Y
- 20.06%
- 3Y*
- 16.61%
- 5Y*
- 10.77%
- 10Y*
- —
PJUL
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 1.12%
- YTD
- 4.63%
- 6M
- 5.28%
- 1Y
- 15.34%
- 3Y*
- 13.94%
- 5Y*
- 10.46%
- 10Y*
- —
BSEP vs. PJUL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSEP Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September | 6.80% | 14.80% | 16.96% | 20.94% | -9.20% | 14.64% | 12.44% | 7.23% |
PJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July | 4.63% | 12.78% | 13.76% | 19.87% | -2.08% | 7.20% | 7.51% | 4.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSEP and PJUL is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2019 | 0.90 |
The correlation between BSEP and PJUL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
BSEP vs. PJUL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BSEP
PJUL
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
BSEP
PJUL
Financial Services
BSEP
PJUL
Communication Services
BSEP
PJUL
Consumer Cyclical
BSEP
PJUL
Healthcare
BSEP
PJUL
Industrials
BSEP
PJUL
Consumer Defensive
BSEP
PJUL
Energy
BSEP
PJUL
Utilities
BSEP
PJUL
Real Estate
BSEP
PJUL
Basic Materials
BSEP
PJUL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSEP vs. PJUL — Risk / Return Rank
BSEP
PJUL
BSEP vs. PJUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September (BSEP) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSEP | PJUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.59 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.53 | 4.23 | -0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.64 | 23.29 | -5.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSEP | PJUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59 | 2.74 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 | 1.22 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
BSEP vs. PJUL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSEP drawdown since its inception was -23.98%, which is greater than PJUL's maximum drawdown of -18.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSEP and PJUL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSEP | PJUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.98% | -18.17% | -5.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.70% | -3.64% | -2.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.36% | -10.69% | -2.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.02% | -10.69% | -4.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.07% | -0.10% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.74% | -1.47% | -1.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.14% | 0.66% | +0.48% |
Volatility
BSEP vs. PJUL - Volatility Comparison
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September (BSEP) has a higher volatility of 0.96% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL) at 0.43%. This indicates that BSEP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PJUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSEP | PJUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.96% | 0.43% | +0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.82% | 3.88% | +1.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.79% | 5.63% | +2.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.61% | 8.60% | +3.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.76% | 10.02% | +3.74% |
BSEP vs. PJUL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BSEP and PJUL have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
BSEP vs. PJUL - Dividend Comparison
Neither BSEP nor PJUL has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSEP Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.39% |
PJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, BSEP and PJUL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BSEP has higher volatility (0.96%) compared to PJUL (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSEP dropped -23.98% vs PJUL's -18.17%.
On 5-year performance, BSEP leads with 10.77% vs 10.46% for PJUL. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, PJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BSEP has performed better with a 10.77% return vs 10.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSEP and PJUL have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
BSEP and PJUL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BSEP tracks S&P 500 Index, while PJUL tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index July.
PJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSEP and PJUL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer