PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSEP vs. PJUL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSEP vs. PJUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September (BSEP) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSEP achieves a 6.80% return, which is significantly higher than PJUL's 4.63% return.


BSEP

1D
0.07%
1M
2.14%
YTD
6.80%
6M
7.19%
1Y
20.06%
3Y*
16.61%
5Y*
10.77%
10Y*

PJUL

1D
-0.10%
1M
1.12%
YTD
4.63%
6M
5.28%
1Y
15.34%
3Y*
13.94%
5Y*
10.46%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSEP vs. PJUL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BSEP
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September
6.80%14.80%16.96%20.94%-9.20%14.64%12.44%7.23%
PJUL
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July
4.63%12.78%13.76%19.87%-2.08%7.20%7.51%4.97%

Correlation

The correlation between BSEP and PJUL is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2019

0.90

The correlation between BSEP and PJUL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

BSEP vs. PJUL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BSEP
PJUL

Technology

36.2%
36.2%

Financial Services

11.9%
11.9%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.4%

Industrials

8.1%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Energy

3.5%
3.5%

Utilities

2.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

BSEP
36.2%
PJUL
36.2%

Financial Services

BSEP
11.9%
PJUL
11.9%

Communication Services

BSEP
10.9%
PJUL
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

BSEP
10.1%
PJUL
10.1%

Healthcare

BSEP
8.4%
PJUL
8.4%

Industrials

BSEP
8.1%
PJUL
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

BSEP
4.9%
PJUL
4.9%

Energy

BSEP
3.5%
PJUL
3.5%

Utilities

BSEP
2.3%
PJUL
2.3%

Real Estate

BSEP
1.9%
PJUL
1.9%

Basic Materials

BSEP
1.8%
PJUL
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSEP vs. PJUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSEP
BSEP Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
BSEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSEP Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
BSEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSEP Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

PJUL
PJUL Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
PJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
PJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSEP vs. PJUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September (BSEP) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSEPPJULDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.59

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.53

4.23

-0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.64

23.29

-5.66

BSEP vs. PJUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSEP Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the PJUL Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSEP and PJUL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSEPPJULDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

2.74

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

1.22

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.89

0.00

Drawdowns

BSEP vs. PJUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSEP drawdown since its inception was -23.98%, which is greater than PJUL's maximum drawdown of -18.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSEP and PJUL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSEPPJULDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.98%

-18.17%

-5.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.70%

-3.64%

-2.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.36%

-10.69%

-2.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.02%

-10.69%

-4.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-0.10%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.74%

-1.47%

-1.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.14%

0.66%

+0.48%

Volatility

BSEP vs. PJUL - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September (BSEP) has a higher volatility of 0.96% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL) at 0.43%. This indicates that BSEP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PJUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSEPPJULDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.96%

0.43%

+0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.82%

3.88%

+1.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.79%

5.63%

+2.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.61%

8.60%

+3.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.76%

10.02%

+3.74%

BSEP vs. PJUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BSEP and PJUL have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

BSEP vs. PJUL - Dividend Comparison

Neither BSEP nor PJUL has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BSEP
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.39%
PJUL
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, BSEP and PJUL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BSEP has higher volatility (0.96%) compared to PJUL (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSEP dropped -23.98% vs PJUL's -18.17%.

On 5-year performance, BSEP leads with 10.77% vs 10.46% for PJUL. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, PJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BSEP has performed better with a 10.77% return vs 10.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSEP and PJUL have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

BSEP and PJUL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

BSEP tracks S&P 500 Index, while PJUL tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index July.

PJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSEP and PJUL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer