BSEP vs. OCTB
BSEP (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September) and OCTB (Aptus October Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. BSEP is passively managed, while OCTB is actively managed. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. BSEP charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for OCTB.
Performance
BSEP vs. OCTB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSEP achieves a 8.26% return, which is significantly higher than OCTB's 7.27% return.
BSEP
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 1.07%
- 6M
- 7.19%
- YTD
- 8.26%
- 1Y
- 17.26%
- 3Y*
- 14.65%
- 5Y*
- 10.76%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.08%
OCTB
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 0.86%
- 6M
- 6.48%
- YTD
- 7.27%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $163.91K | $157.86K | $228.06K | |
| $58.52K | $94.12K | $66.59K |
BSEP vs. OCTB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BSEP Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September | 8.26% | 2.44% |
OCTB Aptus October Buffer ETF | 7.27% | 2.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSEP and OCTB is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025 | 0.96 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSEP vs. OCTB — Risk / Return Rank
BSEP
OCTB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BSEP vs. OCTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September (BSEP) and Aptus October Buffer ETF (OCTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BSEP | OCTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.81 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BSEP vs. OCTB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSEP drawdown since its inception was -23.98%, which is greater than OCTB's maximum drawdown of -4.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSEP and OCTB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSEP | OCTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.98% | -4.79% | -19.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.69% | -0.66% | -2.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.15% | — | — |
Volatility
BSEP vs. OCTB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSEP | OCTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.75% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.92% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.83% | 7.16% | +0.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.65% | 7.16% | +4.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.64% | 7.16% | +6.48% |
BSEP vs. OCTB - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSEP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than OCTB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSEP vs. OCTB - Dividend Comparison
Neither BSEP nor OCTB has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSEP Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.39% |
OCTB Aptus October Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, BSEP and OCTB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, OCTB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OCTB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BSEP.
BSEP and OCTB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Aptus. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BSEP and 0.25% for OCTB.
Find the right allocation for BSEP and OCTB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer