PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSCZ vs. SPBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSCZ vs. SPBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCZ) and SPDR Portfolio Corporate Bond ETF (SPBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSCZ achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly lower than SPBO's 0.70% return.


BSCZ

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.42%
YTD
0.18%
6M
-0.02%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPBO

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.67%
YTD
0.70%
6M
0.47%
1Y
6.29%
3Y*
5.54%
5Y*
0.66%
10Y*
2.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSCZ vs. SPBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BSCZ and SPBO is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025

0.98

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSCZ vs. SPBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSCZ

SPBO
SPBO Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
SPBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPBO Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
SPBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPBO Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSCZ vs. SPBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCZ) and SPDR Portfolio Corporate Bond ETF (SPBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BSCZ vs. SPBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSCZSPBODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.21

0.47

+0.74

Drawdowns

BSCZ vs. SPBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCZ drawdown since its inception was -3.28%, smaller than the maximum SPBO drawdown of -22.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCZ and SPBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSCZSPBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.28%

-22.23%

+18.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.46%

-0.91%

-0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.75%

-4.04%

+3.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.91%

Volatility

BSCZ vs. SPBO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSCZSPBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.98%

4.36%

+0.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.98%

7.18%

-2.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.98%

7.49%

-2.51%

BSCZ vs. SPBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSCZ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than SPBO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BSCZ vs. SPBO - Dividend Comparison

BSCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, less than SPBO's 5.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSCZ
Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF
4.09%2.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPBO
SPDR Portfolio Corporate Bond ETF
5.12%5.09%5.28%4.73%3.54%2.42%2.75%3.46%3.60%3.15%3.35%3.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, BSCZ and SPBO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SPBO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPBO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for BSCZ.

SPBO has the higher dividend yield at 5.12%, compared with 4.09% for BSCZ.

BSCZ tracks BulletShares® USD Corporate Bond 2035 Index, while SPBO tracks Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Corporate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCZ and 0.03% for SPBO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSCZ and SPBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer