BSCZ vs. SPBO
BSCZ (Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF) and SPBO (SPDR Portfolio Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - BSCZ tracks the BulletShares® USD Corporate Bond 2035 Index while SPBO tracks the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Corporate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. BSCZ charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPBO.
Performance
BSCZ vs. SPBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSCZ achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly lower than SPBO's 0.70% return.
BSCZ
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 0.18%
- 6M
- -0.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPBO
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- YTD
- 0.70%
- 6M
- 0.47%
- 1Y
- 6.29%
- 3Y*
- 5.54%
- 5Y*
- 0.66%
- 10Y*
- 2.77%
BSCZ vs. SPBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BSCZ Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.18% | 5.67% |
SPBO SPDR Portfolio Corporate Bond ETF | 0.70% | 4.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSCZ and SPBO is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025 | 0.98 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSCZ vs. SPBO — Risk / Return Rank
BSCZ
SPBO
BSCZ vs. SPBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCZ) and SPDR Portfolio Corporate Bond ETF (SPBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSCZ | SPBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.21 | 0.47 | +0.74 |
Drawdowns
BSCZ vs. SPBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSCZ drawdown since its inception was -3.28%, smaller than the maximum SPBO drawdown of -22.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCZ and SPBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSCZ | SPBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.28% | -22.23% | +18.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -6.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.46% | -0.91% | -0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.75% | -4.04% | +3.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.91% | — |
Volatility
BSCZ vs. SPBO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSCZ | SPBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.35% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.21% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.98% | 4.36% | +0.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.98% | 7.18% | -2.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.98% | 7.49% | -2.51% |
BSCZ vs. SPBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSCZ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than SPBO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BSCZ vs. SPBO - Dividend Comparison
BSCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, less than SPBO's 5.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCZ Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.09% | 2.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPBO SPDR Portfolio Corporate Bond ETF | 5.12% | 5.09% | 5.28% | 4.73% | 3.54% | 2.42% | 2.75% | 3.46% | 3.60% | 3.15% | 3.35% | 3.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, BSCZ and SPBO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SPBO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPBO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for BSCZ.
SPBO has the higher dividend yield at 5.12%, compared with 4.09% for BSCZ.
BSCZ tracks BulletShares® USD Corporate Bond 2035 Index, while SPBO tracks Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Corporate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCZ and 0.03% for SPBO.
Find the right allocation for BSCZ and SPBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer