BSCZ vs. IGBH
BSCZ (Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF) and IGBH (iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - BSCZ tracks the BulletShares® USD Corporate Bond 2035 Index while IGBH tracks the BlackRock Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BSCZ charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for IGBH.
Performance
BSCZ vs. IGBH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSCZ achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly lower than IGBH's 2.31% return.
BSCZ
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 0.18%
- 6M
- -0.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGBH
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 1.78%
- YTD
- 2.31%
- 6M
- 3.18%
- 1Y
- 9.39%
- 3Y*
- 8.96%
- 5Y*
- 5.27%
- 10Y*
- 5.04%
BSCZ vs. IGBH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BSCZ Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.18% | 5.67% |
IGBH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 2.31% | 6.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSCZ and IGBH is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSCZ vs. IGBH — Risk / Return Rank
BSCZ
IGBH
BSCZ vs. IGBH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCZ) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGBH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSCZ | IGBH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.21 | 0.52 | +0.70 |
Drawdowns
BSCZ vs. IGBH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSCZ drawdown since its inception was -3.28%, smaller than the maximum IGBH drawdown of -33.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCZ and IGBH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSCZ | IGBH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.28% | -33.67% | +30.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -6.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -10.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.46% | -0.19% | -1.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.75% | -2.67% | +1.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.15% | — |
Volatility
BSCZ vs. IGBH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSCZ | IGBH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.87% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.98% | 4.05% | +0.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.98% | 6.13% | -1.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.98% | 9.20% | -4.22% |
BSCZ vs. IGBH - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSCZ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than IGBH's 0.16% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BSCZ vs. IGBH - Dividend Comparison
BSCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, less than IGBH's 5.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCZ Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.09% | 2.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IGBH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 5.66% | 6.23% | 6.88% | 7.32% | 3.84% | 2.71% | 2.39% | 3.40% | 5.56% | 2.87% | 2.62% | 1.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSCZ and IGBH have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BSCZ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSCZ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for IGBH.
IGBH has the higher dividend yield at 5.66%, compared with 4.09% for BSCZ.
BSCZ tracks BulletShares® USD Corporate Bond 2035 Index, while IGBH tracks BlackRock Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCZ and 0.16% for IGBH.
Find the right allocation for BSCZ and IGBH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer