PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSCY vs. USIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSCY vs. USIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2034 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCY) and iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (USIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSCY achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly lower than USIG's 0.56% return.


BSCY

1D
-0.27%
1M
0.33%
YTD
0.25%
6M
0.11%
1Y
6.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

USIG

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.56%
YTD
0.56%
6M
0.37%
1Y
6.04%
3Y*
5.46%
5Y*
0.72%
10Y*
2.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSCY vs. USIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BSCY and USIG is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2024

0.97

The correlation between BSCY and USIG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSCY vs. USIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSCY
BSCY Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
BSCY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSCY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSCY Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
BSCY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSCY Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

USIG
USIG Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
USIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
USIG Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
USIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
USIG Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSCY vs. USIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2034 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCY) and iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (USIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSCYUSIGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.26

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

2.17

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.97

7.07

-0.10

BSCY vs. USIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSCY Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the USIG Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSCY and USIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSCYUSIGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

1.47

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.07

0.54

+0.53

Drawdowns

BSCY vs. USIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCY drawdown since its inception was -5.44%, smaller than the maximum USIG drawdown of -22.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCY and USIG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSCYUSIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.44%

-22.21%

+16.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.11%

-2.79%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.34%

-0.97%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.23%

-3.42%

+2.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

0.86%

+0.08%

Volatility

BSCY vs. USIG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco BulletShares 2034 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCY) has a higher volatility of 1.49% compared to iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (USIG) at 1.27%. This indicates that BSCY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSCYUSIGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.49%

1.27%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.31%

3.04%

+0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.54%

4.13%

+0.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.61%

6.82%

-1.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.61%

6.82%

-1.21%

BSCY vs. USIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSCY has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than USIG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BSCY vs. USIG - Dividend Comparison

BSCY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.87%, more than USIG's 4.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSCY
Invesco BulletShares 2034 Corporate Bond ETF
4.87%4.79%2.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USIG
iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.74%4.62%4.51%3.94%3.14%2.33%2.82%3.37%3.44%3.03%2.87%3.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, BSCY and USIG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BSCY has higher volatility (1.49%) compared to USIG (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCY dropped -5.44% vs USIG's -22.21%.

On 1-year performance, BSCY leads with 6.52% vs 6.04% for USIG. On fees, USIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, USIG has been the lower-risk option at 1.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BSCY has performed better with a 6.52% return vs 6.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for BSCY.

BSCY has the higher dividend yield at 4.87%, compared with 4.74% for USIG.

BSCY tracks Nasdaq BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2034 Index, while USIG tracks ICE BofA US Corporate. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCY and 0.04% for USIG.

USIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSCY and USIG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer