BSCY vs. CEMB

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

BSCY (Invesco BulletShares 2034 Corporate Bond ETF) and CEMB (iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - BSCY tracks the Nasdaq BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2034 Index while CEMB tracks the JP Morgan CEMBI Broad Diversified. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BSCY returned 6.86% vs 7.31% for CEMB. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BSCY charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CEMB.

Performance

BSCY vs. CEMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2034 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCY) and iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF (CEMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSCY achieves a 0.52% return, which is significantly lower than CEMB's 1.49% return.

BSCY

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 0.52%
• 6M: 0.71%
• 1Y: 6.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CEMB

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 0.46%
• YTD: 1.49%
• 6M: 1.83%
• 1Y: 7.31%
• 3Y*: 7.31%
• 5Y*: 1.97%
• 10Y*: 3.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSCY vs. CEMB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BSCY Invesco BulletShares 2034 Corporate Bond ETF	0.52%	9.18%	2.41%
CEMB iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF	1.49%	8.86%	3.12%

Correlation

The correlation between BSCY and CEMB is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2024	0.79

The correlation between BSCY and CEMB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

BSCY vs. CEMB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BSCY	CEMB
Healthcare	11.0%	-
Technology	10.4%	-
Energy	9.8%	-
Financial Services	9.2%	-
Industrials	8.1%	100.0%
Communication Services	6.7%	-
Consumer Cyclical	5.9%	-
Utilities	5.3%	-
Real Estate	4.5%	-
Consumer Defensive	3.9%	-
Basic Materials	2.6%	-

Return for Risk

BSCY vs. CEMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSCY

BSCY Risk / Return Rank: 43
BSCY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
BSCY Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
BSCY Omega Ratio Rank: 40
BSCY Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
BSCY Martin Ratio Rank: 44

CEMB

CEMB Risk / Return Rank: 69
CEMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
CEMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
CEMB Omega Ratio Rank: 78
CEMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
CEMB Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSCY vs. CEMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2034 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCY) and iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF (CEMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BSCY	CEMB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	2.40	-0.88
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.26	3.61	-1.36
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.47	-0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.16	2.55	-0.39
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.20	11.06	-3.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BSCY vs. CEMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSCY Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is lower than the CEMB Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSCY and CEMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BSCY	CEMB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.52	2.40	-0.88
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.35	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.56	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.10	0.49	+0.60

Drawdowns

BSCY vs. CEMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCY drawdown since its inception was -5.44%, smaller than the maximum CEMB drawdown of -20.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCY and CEMB.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSCY	CEMB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.44%	-20.84%	+15.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.11%	-2.88%	-0.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-3.85%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.48%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-20.84%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.08%	-0.24%	-0.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.23%	-3.66%	+2.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.93%	0.66%	+0.27%

Volatility

BSCY vs. CEMB - Volatility Comparison

Invesco BulletShares 2034 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCY) has a higher volatility of 1.50% compared to iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF (CEMB) at 1.08%. This indicates that BSCY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BSCY	CEMB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.50%	1.08%	+0.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.33%	2.43%	+0.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.53%	3.06%	+1.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.62%	5.63%	-0.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.62%	6.30%	-0.68%

BSCY vs. CEMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSCY has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than CEMB's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

BSCY vs. CEMB - Dividend Comparison

BSCY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, less than CEMB's 5.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BSCY Invesco BulletShares 2034 Corporate Bond ETF	4.86%	4.79%	2.43%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CEMB iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF	5.13%	5.14%	5.11%	4.77%	4.29%	3.51%	3.86%	4.19%	4.66%	4.06%	4.26%	4.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BSCY and CEMB in my portfolio?

BSCY and CEMB have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BSCY or CEMB?

BSCY has higher volatility (1.50%) compared to CEMB (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCY dropped -5.44% vs CEMB's -20.84%.

Which ETF is better, BSCY or CEMB?

On 1-year performance, CEMB leads with 7.31% vs 6.86% for BSCY. On fees, BSCY is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, CEMB has been the lower-risk option at 1.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BSCY or CEMB?

Over the 1-year period, CEMB has performed better with a 7.31% return vs 6.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BSCY or CEMB?

BSCY is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CEMB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BSCY or CEMB?

CEMB has the higher dividend yield at 5.13%, compared with 4.86% for BSCY.

What is the main difference between BSCY and CEMB?

BSCY tracks Nasdaq BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2034 Index, while CEMB tracks JP Morgan CEMBI Broad Diversified. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCY and 0.50% for CEMB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CEMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.