BSCV vs. QCON
BSCV (Invesco BulletShares 2031 Corporate Bond ETF) and QCON (American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. BSCV is passively managed, while QCON is actively managed. BSCV charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for QCON.
Performance
BSCV vs. QCON - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BSCV
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 0.13%
- 6M
- 0.29%
- 1Y
- 5.33%
- 3Y*
- 5.70%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QCON
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSCV vs. QCON - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BSCV Invesco BulletShares 2031 Corporate Bond ETF | -0.40% |
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF | 0.00% |
BSCV vs. QCON - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BSCV
QCON
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Technology
BSCV
QCON
-
Healthcare
BSCV
QCON
-
Consumer Cyclical
BSCV
QCON
-
Financial Services
BSCV
QCON
Communication Services
BSCV
QCON
-
Energy
BSCV
QCON
-
Industrials
BSCV
QCON
Real Estate
BSCV
QCON
-
Consumer Defensive
BSCV
QCON
-
Utilities
BSCV
QCON
Basic Materials
BSCV
QCON
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSCV vs. QCON — Risk / Return Rank
BSCV
QCON
BSCV vs. QCON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2031 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCV) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSCV | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.17 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.18 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSCV | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.00 | — | — |
Drawdowns
BSCV vs. QCON - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSCV drawdown since its inception was -23.28%, which is greater than QCON's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCV and QCON.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSCV | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.28% | 0.00% | -23.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.19% | 0.00% | -1.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.56% | 0.00% | -9.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.74% | — | — |
Volatility
BSCV vs. QCON - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSCV | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.02% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.44% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.44% | 0.00% | +3.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.36% | 0.00% | +7.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.36% | 0.00% | +7.36% |
BSCV vs. QCON - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSCV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than QCON's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSCV vs. QCON - Dividend Comparison
BSCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, while QCON has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCV Invesco BulletShares 2031 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.69% | 4.65% | 4.87% | 4.47% | 3.43% | 0.57% |
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, BSCV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSCV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for QCON.
BSCV has the higher dividend yield at 4.69%, compared with 0.00% for QCON.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCV and 0.32% for QCON.
Find the right allocation for BSCV and QCON
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer