BSCV vs. JEPQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BSCV (Invesco BulletShares 2031 Corporate Bond ETF) and JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSCV is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares Corporate Bond 2031 Index, while JEPQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BSCV returned 5.70%/yr vs 20.92%/yr for JEPQ. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BSCV charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEPQ.

Performance

BSCV vs. JEPQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2031 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCV) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSCV achieves a 0.13% return, which is significantly lower than JEPQ's 9.54% return.

BSCV

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 0.19%
• YTD: 0.13%
• 6M: 0.29%
• 1Y: 5.33%
• 3Y*: 5.70%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JEPQ

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 4.31%
• YTD: 9.54%
• 6M: 9.75%
• 1Y: 29.00%
• 3Y*: 20.92%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSCV vs. JEPQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
BSCV Invesco BulletShares 2031 Corporate Bond ETF	0.13%	9.04%	2.62%	9.16%	-4.28%
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF	9.54%	15.18%	24.85%	36.28%	-12.89%

Correlation

The correlation between BSCV and JEPQ is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2022	0.26

BSCV vs. JEPQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BSCV	JEPQ
Technology	13.8%	54.0%
Healthcare	13.1%	4.4%
Consumer Cyclical	9.4%	12.8%
Financial Services	9.2%	0.4%
Communication Services	8.6%	15.4%
Energy	7.3%	0.4%
Industrials	6.4%	3.1%
Real Estate	5.2%	0.2%
Consumer Defensive	4.4%	7.1%
Utilities	3.8%	1.3%
Basic Materials	1.2%	1.0%

Return for Risk

BSCV vs. JEPQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSCV

BSCV Risk / Return Rank: 45
BSCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
BSCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
BSCV Omega Ratio Rank: 44
BSCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
BSCV Martin Ratio Rank: 44

JEPQ

JEPQ Risk / Return Rank: 74
JEPQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
JEPQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
JEPQ Omega Ratio Rank: 80
JEPQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
JEPQ Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSCV vs. JEPQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2031 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCV) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BSCV	JEPQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	2.49	-0.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.38	3.29	-0.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.49	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.17	3.31	-1.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.18	16.22	-9.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BSCV vs. JEPQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSCV Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is lower than the JEPQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSCV and JEPQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BSCV	JEPQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.55	2.49	-0.93
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.00	1.00	-1.00

Drawdowns

BSCV vs. JEPQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCV drawdown since its inception was -23.28%, which is greater than JEPQ's maximum drawdown of -20.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCV and JEPQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSCV	JEPQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.28%	-20.07%	-3.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.47%	-8.82%	+6.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.75%	-20.07%	+13.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.19%	-0.10%	-1.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.56%	-3.42%	-6.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.74%	1.79%	-1.05%

Volatility

BSCV vs. JEPQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2031 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCV) is 1.02%, while JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) has a volatility of 1.26%. This indicates that BSCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JEPQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BSCV	JEPQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.02%	1.26%	-0.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.44%	9.07%	-6.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.44%	11.73%	-8.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.36%	16.61%	-9.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.36%	16.61%	-9.25%

BSCV vs. JEPQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSCV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than JEPQ's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

BSCV vs. JEPQ - Dividend Comparison

BSCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, less than JEPQ's 10.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BSCV Invesco BulletShares 2031 Corporate Bond ETF	4.69%	4.65%	4.87%	4.47%	3.43%	0.57%
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF	10.07%	10.53%	9.65%	10.03%	9.44%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BSCV and JEPQ in my portfolio?

BSCV and JEPQ have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BSCV or JEPQ?

JEPQ has higher volatility (1.26%) compared to BSCV (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCV dropped -23.28% vs JEPQ's -20.07%.

Which ETF is better, BSCV or JEPQ?

On 3-year performance, JEPQ leads with 20.92% vs 5.70% for BSCV. On fees, BSCV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, BSCV has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BSCV or JEPQ?

Over the 3-year period, JEPQ has performed better with a 20.92% return vs 5.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BSCV or JEPQ?

BSCV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for JEPQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BSCV or JEPQ?

JEPQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.07%, compared with 4.69% for BSCV.

What is the main difference between BSCV and JEPQ?

BSCV is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while JEPQ is Nasdaq-100. BSCV tracks Invesco BulletShares Corporate Bond 2031 Index, while JEPQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCV and 0.35% for JEPQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JEPQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.