BSCV vs. DBO
BSCV (Invesco BulletShares 2031 Corporate Bond ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - BSCV is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares Corporate Bond 2031 Index, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BSCV returned 5.70%/yr vs 21.86%/yr for DBO. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. BSCV charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
BSCV vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSCV achieves a 0.13% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 84.75% return.
BSCV
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 0.13%
- 6M
- 0.29%
- 1Y
- 5.33%
- 3Y*
- 5.70%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBO
- 1D
- 2.27%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- 84.75%
- 6M
- 81.10%
- 1Y
- 80.26%
- 3Y*
- 21.86%
- 5Y*
- 15.98%
- 10Y*
- 11.37%
BSCV vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCV Invesco BulletShares 2031 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.13% | 9.04% | 2.62% | 9.16% | -16.90% | -1.62% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 84.75% | -11.71% | 7.85% | -4.44% | 13.04% | 2.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSCV and DBO is -0.41, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2021 | -0.11 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between BSCV and DBO has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.11 to -0.41, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
BSCV vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BSCV
DBO
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
BSCV
DBO
-
Healthcare
BSCV
DBO
-
Consumer Cyclical
BSCV
DBO
-
Financial Services
BSCV
DBO
Communication Services
BSCV
DBO
-
Energy
BSCV
DBO
-
Industrials
BSCV
DBO
-
Real Estate
BSCV
DBO
-
Consumer Defensive
BSCV
DBO
-
Utilities
BSCV
DBO
-
Basic Materials
BSCV
DBO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSCV vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
BSCV
DBO
BSCV vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2031 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCV) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSCV | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.38 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.17 | 4.44 | -2.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.18 | 9.02 | -1.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSCV | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | 2.34 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.00 | 0.02 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
BSCV vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSCV drawdown since its inception was -23.28%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCV and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSCV | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.28% | -90.18% | +66.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.47% | -18.19% | +15.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.75% | -28.20% | +21.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.19% | -51.38% | +50.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.56% | -62.25% | +52.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.74% | 8.92% | -8.18% |
Volatility
BSCV vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2031 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCV) is 1.02%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.61%. This indicates that BSCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSCV | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.02% | 12.61% | -11.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.44% | 28.20% | -25.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.44% | 34.46% | -31.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.36% | 32.29% | -24.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.36% | 31.78% | -24.42% |
BSCV vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSCV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSCV vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
BSCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, more than DBO's 1.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCV Invesco BulletShares 2031 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.69% | 4.65% | 4.87% | 4.47% | 3.43% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 1.90% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSCV and DBO have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBO has higher volatility (12.61%) compared to BSCV (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCV dropped -23.28% vs DBO's -90.18%.
On 3-year performance, DBO leads with 21.86% vs 5.70% for BSCV. On fees, BSCV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, BSCV has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DBO has performed better with a 21.86% return vs 5.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSCV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.
BSCV has the higher dividend yield at 4.69%, compared with 1.90% for DBO.
BSCV is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while DBO is Oil & Gas. BSCV tracks Invesco BulletShares Corporate Bond 2031 Index, while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCV and 0.78% for DBO.
DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSCV and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer